Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder code using time coverage" » "coder code using the coverage" (Expand search), "coder code using live coverage" (Expand search), "coder code using time average" (Expand search), "code code using time coverage" (Expand search), "modern code using time coverage" (Expand search), "color code using time coverage" (Expand search), "coder made using time coverage" (Expand search), "coder coding using time coverage" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder code using time coverage\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder code using time coverage ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder code using time coverage") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.