Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)
"coder code using six coverage" » "coder code using in coverage" (Expand search), "coder code using max coverage" (Expand search), "coder code using high coverage" (Expand search), "code code using six coverage" (Expand search), "modern code using six coverage" (Expand search), "color code using six coverage" (Expand search), "coder made using six coverage" (Expand search), "coder coding using six coverage" (Expand search), "coder code using s coverage" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder code using six coverage\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder code using six coverage ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder code using six coverage") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.