Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)
"coder code using new coverage" » "coder code using news coverage" (Expand search), "coder code using low coverage" (Expand search), "coder code using new beverage" (Expand search), "code code using new coverage" (Expand search), "modern code using new coverage" (Expand search), "color code using new coverage" (Expand search), "coder made using new coverage" (Expand search), "coder coding using new coverage" (Expand search), "coder code using near coverage" (Expand search), "coder code using non coverage" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder code using new coverage\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder code using new coverage ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder code using new coverage") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.