Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder code using insertion and" » "coder code using inertial and" (Expand search), "coder code using induction and" (Expand search), "coder code using information and" (Expand search), "coder code using insertion in" (Expand search), "coder code using insertion of" (Expand search), "code code using insertion and" (Expand search), "modern code using insertion and" (Expand search), "color code using insertion and" (Expand search), "coder made using insertion and" (Expand search), "coder coding using insertion and" (Expand search)
"api python python python programming" » "api pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "api piton python python programming" (Expand search), "api pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "rpa python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder code using insertion and\") OR (\"api python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder code using insertion and ) OR ( api python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder code using insertion and") OR ("api python python python programming"))*.