Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder code coverage predicted functional" » "coder code coverage predicts functional" (Expand search), "coder code coverage predicted functions" (Expand search), "coder code coverage reduced functional" (Expand search), "coder code average predicted functional" (Expand search), "coder code coverage prediction functional" (Expand search), "coder code coverage produced functional" (Expand search), "coder care coverage predicted functional" (Expand search), "coder and coverage predicted functional" (Expand search), "coder the coverage predicted functional" (Expand search), "code code coverage predicted functional" (Expand search), "modern code coverage predicted functional" (Expand search), "color code coverage predicted functional" (Expand search)
"api python python python programming" » "api pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "api piton python python programming" (Expand search), "api pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "rpa python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder code coverage predicted functional\") OR (\"api python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder code coverage predicted functional ) OR ( api python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder code coverage predicted functional") OR ("api python python python programming"))*.