Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder code coverage litigation function" » "coder code coverage estimation function" (Expand search), "coder code covenants litigation function" (Expand search), "coder code coverage location function" (Expand search), "coder code coverage activation function" (Expand search), "coder code coverage titration function" (Expand search), "coder care coverage litigation function" (Expand search), "coder and coverage litigation function" (Expand search), "coder the coverage litigation function" (Expand search), "code code coverage litigation function" (Expand search), "modern code coverage litigation function" (Expand search), "color code coverage litigation function" (Expand search)
"_ python python python programming" » "_ pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder code coverage litigation function\") OR (\"_ python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder code coverage litigation function ) OR ( _ python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder code coverage litigation function") OR ("_ python python python programming"))*.