Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder allocation in evolving problem" » "power allocation in evolving problem" (Expand search), "order allocation in evolving problem" (Expand search), "over allocation in evolving problem" (Expand search), "coder allocation in solving problem" (Expand search), "coder allocation in solving problems" (Expand search), "coder allocation in folding problem" (Expand search), "coder allocation of evolving problem" (Expand search), "coder allocation an evolving problem" (Expand search), "coder allocation in resolving problem" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder allocation in evolving problem\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder allocation in evolving problem ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder allocation in evolving problem") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.