Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder activation functions deviations in" » "coder activation function deviations in" (Expand search), "coder activation functions definitions in" (Expand search), "coder activation function desviation in" (Expand search), "coder activation functions equations in" (Expand search), "over activation functions deviations in" (Expand search), "cone activation functions deviations in" (Expand search), "uncover activation functions deviations in" (Expand search), "coder activation functions variations in" (Expand search), "coder activation functions deviation of" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder activation functions deviations in\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder activation functions deviations in ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder activation functions deviations in") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.