Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"code implications on coverage and" » "some implications on coverage and" (Expand search), "care implications on coverage and" (Expand search), "code applications on coverage and" (Expand search), "code implications of coverage and" (Expand search), "code implications in coverage and" (Expand search), "code implications _ coverage and" (Expand search), "code implications on coverage in" (Expand search), "code implications on coverage of" (Expand search), "code implications bone coverage and" (Expand search), "code implications and coverage and" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"code implications on coverage and\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( code implications on coverage and ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("code implications on coverage and") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.