Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"code implementation in coverage from" » "model implementation in coverage from" (Expand search), "care implementation in coverage from" (Expand search), "coffee implementation in coverage from" (Expand search), "code implementation and coverage from" (Expand search), "code implementation of coverage from" (Expand search), "code implementation in beverage from" (Expand search), "code implementation in coverage of" (Expand search), "code implementation in coverage on" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"code implementation in coverage from\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( code implementation in coverage from ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("code implementation in coverage from") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.