Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"code computationally predicted coverage on" » "code computational prediction coverage on" (Expand search), "code computationally designed coverage on" (Expand search), "code computationally assisted coverage on" (Expand search), "code computational predicted coverage on" (Expand search), "made computationally predicted coverage on" (Expand search), "of computationally predicted coverage on" (Expand search), "code computationally predicted coverage of" (Expand search), "code computationally predicted coverage in" (Expand search), "code computationally predicted coverage and" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"code computationally predicted coverage on\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( code computationally predicted coverage on ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("code computationally predicted coverage on") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.