Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"code computationally efficient coverage on" » "code computational efficiency coverage on" (Expand search), "code computational efficient coverage on" (Expand search), "made computationally efficient coverage on" (Expand search), "of computationally efficient coverage on" (Expand search), "code computationally efficient overall on" (Expand search), "code computationally efficient concrete on" (Expand search), "code computationally efficient storage on" (Expand search), "code computationally efficient coverage of" (Expand search), "code computationally efficient coverage in" (Expand search), "code computationally efficient coverage and" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("code computationally efficient coverage on") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"code computationally efficient coverage on\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( code computationally efficient coverage on ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.