Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"code computationally designed coverage in" » "code computational design coverage in" (Expand search), "code rationally designed coverage in" (Expand search), "code computational designed coverage in" (Expand search), "made computationally designed coverage in" (Expand search), "of computationally designed coverage in" (Expand search), "code computationally signal coverage in" (Expand search), "code computationally device coverage in" (Expand search), "code computationally designed coverage of" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"code computationally designed coverage in\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( code computationally designed coverage in ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("code computationally designed coverage in") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.