Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"code computational semiotic coverage in" » "code computational semiotics coverage in" (Expand search), "code computational semantics coverage in" (Expand search), "code computational statistics coverage in" (Expand search), "model computational semiotic coverage in" (Expand search), "cfd computational semiotic coverage in" (Expand search), "some computational semiotic coverage in" (Expand search), "code computational mediatic coverage in" (Expand search), "code computational thematic coverage in" (Expand search), "code computational semiotic coverage of" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"code computational semiotic coverage in\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( code computational semiotic coverage in ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("code computational semiotic coverage in") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.