Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"code computation reuse coverage in" » "code computation nets coverage in" (Expand search), "code computation tree coverage in" (Expand search), "code computation the coverage in" (Expand search), "core computation reuse coverage in" (Expand search), "code computational reuse coverage in" (Expand search), "pose computation reuse coverage in" (Expand search), "code computation rule coverage in" (Expand search), "code computation cusp coverage in" (Expand search), "code computation tube coverage in" (Expand search), "code computation reuse coverage of" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("code computation reuse coverage in") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"code computation reuse coverage in\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( code computation reuse coverage in ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.