Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"by computational values coverage in" » "by computational issues coverage in" (Expand search), "by computational bases coverage in" (Expand search), "by computational analyses coverage in" (Expand search), "_ computational values coverage in" (Expand search), "and computational values coverage in" (Expand search), "by computational values corporate in" (Expand search), "by computational changes coverage in" (Expand search), "by computational values coverage of" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"by computational values coverage in\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( by computational values coverage in ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("by computational values coverage in") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.