Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"by computation gnu octave programming" » "by computation gnu stage programming" (Expand search), "by computation gnu objective programming" (Expand search), "by computation gnu reactive programming" (Expand search), "by computation and octave programming" (Expand search), "by computation in octave programming" (Expand search), "by computation on octave programming" (Expand search), "by computational gnu octave programming" (Expand search), "of computation gnu octave programming" (Expand search), "_ computation gnu octave programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"by computation gnu octave programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( by computation gnu octave programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("by computation gnu octave programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.