Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"boosting compression in computational code" » "locking compression in computational code" (Expand search), "using compression in computational code" (Expand search), "boosting regression in computational code" (Expand search), "boosting compression in computational model" (Expand search), "boosting compression in computational cost" (Expand search), "boosting compression in computational models" (Expand search), "boosting compression and computational code" (Expand search), "boosting compression _ computational code" (Expand search), "boosting compression of computational code" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"boosting compression in computational code\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( boosting compression in computational code ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("boosting compression in computational code") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.