Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"boosted regression in active programming" » "boosted regression in reactive programming" (Expand search), "boosted regression in octave programming" (Expand search), "boosted regression in adaptive programming" (Expand search), "boosted regression and active programming" (Expand search), "boosted regression _ active programming" (Expand search), "boosted regression an active programming" (Expand search), "boosted regression in action programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"boosted regression in active programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( boosted regression in active programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("boosted regression in active programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.