Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"based implication in conducting program" » "based implication in consulting program" (Expand search), "based implication in constructing program" (Expand search), "based implication in computing program" (Expand search), "based application in conducting program" (Expand search), "based replication in conducting program" (Expand search), "based aplication in conducting program" (Expand search), "based implications in conducting program" (Expand search), "based implications on conducting program" (Expand search), "based implication of conducting program" (Expand search), "based implication ion conducting program" (Expand search), "based implication _ conducting program" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"based implication in conducting program\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( based implication in conducting program ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("based implication in conducting program") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.