Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"based decomposition with java programming" » "and decomposition with java programming" (Expand search), "base composition with java programming" (Expand search), "acid decomposition with java programming" (Expand search), "based composition with java programming" (Expand search), "based decomposition in java programming" (Expand search), "based decomposition rate java programming" (Expand search), "based decomposition with and programming" (Expand search), "based decomposition with based programming" (Expand search), "based decomposition with goal programming" (Expand search), "based decomposition with guava programming" (Expand search), "based decomposition with jalo programming" (Expand search), "based decomposition with jack programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("based decomposition with java programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"based decomposition with java programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( based decomposition with java programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.