Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"based decomposition in routine programming" » "and decomposition in routine programming" (Expand search), "base composition in routine programming" (Expand search), "acid decomposition in routine programming" (Expand search), "based decomposition in reactive programming" (Expand search), "based decomposition in cone programming" (Expand search), "based decomposition in line programming" (Expand search), "based decomposition and routine programming" (Expand search), "based decomposition of routine programming" (Expand search), "based decomposition _ routine programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("based decomposition in routine programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"based decomposition in routine programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( based decomposition in routine programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.