Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"and decomposition with java programming" » "and composition with java programming" (Expand search), "and decomposition in java programming" (Expand search), "and decomposition rate java programming" (Expand search), "and decomposition with and programming" (Expand search), "and decomposition with based programming" (Expand search), "and decomposition with goal programming" (Expand search), "and decomposition with guava programming" (Expand search), "and decomposition with jalo programming" (Expand search), "and decomposition with jack programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("and decomposition with java programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"and decomposition with java programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( and decomposition with java programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.