Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"and computational python in objects" » "and computacional python in objects" (Expand search), "and computacional vpython in objects" (Expand search), "and computacionais python in objects" (Expand search), "_ computational python in objects" (Expand search), "and computational python in object" (Expand search), "and computational python on objects" (Expand search), "and computational python and objects" (Expand search), "and computational python _ objects" (Expand search), "and computational python of objects" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("and computational python in objects") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"and computational python in objects\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( and computational python in objects ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.