Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"_ formulations using reactive programming" » "_ formulations using objective programming" (Expand search), "_ formulations using teaching programming" (Expand search), "_ formulations using declarative programming" (Expand search), "_ formulations and reactive programming" (Expand search), "_ formulations using reductive programming" (Expand search), "_ formulations during reactive programming" (Expand search), "_ formulations using active programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"_ formulations using reactive programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( _ formulations using reactive programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("_ formulations using reactive programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.