Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"_ decomposition in haskell programming" » "_ decomposition in based programming" (Expand search), "_ decomposition in cell programming" (Expand search), "_ decomposition in pascal programming" (Expand search), "_ decomposition and haskell programming" (Expand search), "_ decomposition of haskell programming" (Expand search), "_ decomposition _ haskell programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"_ decomposition in haskell programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( _ decomposition in haskell programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("_ decomposition in haskell programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.