Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"_ convolutional coding using projections" » "_ convolutional codes using projections" (Expand search), "_ convolutional code using projections" (Expand search), "_ convolutional long using projections" (Expand search), "_ convolutional coding using production" (Expand search), "_ convolutional coding using projective" (Expand search), "_ convolutional coding in projections" (Expand search), "_ convolutional loading using projections" (Expand search), "_ convolutional modeling using projections" (Expand search), "_ convolutional drying using projections" (Expand search)
"same implications from python programming" » "some implications from python programming" (Expand search), "sample implications from python programming" (Expand search), "state implications from python programming" (Expand search), "same implications of python programming" (Expand search), "same implications on python programming" (Expand search), "same implications to python programming" (Expand search), "same implications from pathogen programming" (Expand search), "same implications from anthony programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"_ convolutional coding using projections\") OR (\"same implications from python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( _ convolutional coding using projections ) OR ( same implications from python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("_ convolutional coding using projections") OR ("same implications from python programming"))*.