Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"_ convolutional coding using projections" » "_ convolutional codes using projections" (Expand search), "_ convolutional code using projections" (Expand search), "_ convolutional long using projections" (Expand search), "_ convolutional coding using production" (Expand search), "_ convolutional coding using projective" (Expand search), "_ convolutional coding in projections" (Expand search), "_ convolutional loading using projections" (Expand search), "_ convolutional modeling using projections" (Expand search), "_ convolutional drying using projections" (Expand search)
"advanced glication from python programming" » "advanced glycation from python programming" (Expand search), "advanced application from python programming" (Expand search), "advanced oxidation from python programming" (Expand search), "advanced location from python programming" (Expand search), "advanced publication from python programming" (Expand search), "advanced glication from pathogen programming" (Expand search), "advanced glication from anthony programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"_ convolutional coding using projections\") OR (\"advanced glication from python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( _ convolutional coding using projections ) OR ( advanced glication from python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("_ convolutional coding using projections") OR ("advanced glication from python programming"))*.