Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"_ convolutional coding planning problem" » "_ convolutional codes planning problem" (Expand search), "_ convolutional code planning problem" (Expand search), "_ convolutional long planning problem" (Expand search), "_ convolutional coding packing problem" (Expand search), "_ convolutional coding planning process" (Expand search), "_ convolutional coping planning problem" (Expand search), "_ convolutional loading planning problem" (Expand search), "_ convolutional zoning planning problem" (Expand search)
"advanced coding python python programming" » "advanced modeling python python programming" (Expand search), "advanced coatings python python programming" (Expand search), "advanced cutting python python programming" (Expand search), "advanced codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "advanced codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "advanced using python python programming" (Expand search), "advanced coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "advanced coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "advanced coding pitons python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("_ convolutional coding planning problem") OR ("advanced coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"_ convolutional coding planning problem\") OR (\"advanced coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( _ convolutional coding planning problem ) OR ( advanced coding python python programming ))*.