Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"_ computations using iterative programming" » "_ computations using imperative programming" (Expand search), "_ computations using generative programming" (Expand search), "_ computations using literate programming" (Expand search), "_ computation using iterative programming" (Expand search), "_ populations using iterative programming" (Expand search), "_ computations in iterative programming" (Expand search), "_ computations using interactive programming" (Expand search), "_ computations using integrative programming" (Expand search), "_ computations using alternative programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"_ computations using iterative programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( _ computations using iterative programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("_ computations using iterative programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.