Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"_ computations using inductive programming" » "_ computations using disjunctive programming" (Expand search), "_ computations using objective programming" (Expand search), "_ computations using reactive programming" (Expand search), "_ computation using inductive programming" (Expand search), "_ populations using inductive programming" (Expand search), "_ computations in inductive programming" (Expand search), "_ computations using inductively programming" (Expand search), "_ computations using conductive programming" (Expand search), "_ computations using reductive programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"_ computations using inductive programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( _ computations using inductive programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("_ computations using inductive programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.