Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"using computation in agile programming" » "using computation in tangible programming" (Expand search), "using computation in line programming" (Expand search), "using computation in agent programming" (Expand search), "using computational in agile programming" (Expand search), "using imputation in agile programming" (Expand search), "using compilation in agile programming" (Expand search), "using computation and agile programming" (Expand search), "using computation of agile programming" (Expand search), "using computation in aging programming" (Expand search), "using computation in age programming" (Expand search)
"_ computational in coding program" » "_ computational and coding program" (Expand search), "_ computational _ coding program" (Expand search), "_ computational 3d coding program" (Expand search), "_ computational in cloning program" (Expand search), "_ computational in loading program" (Expand search), "_ computational in cooling programs" (Expand search), "_ computational on coding program" (Expand search), "_ computational in decoding program" (Expand search), "_ computational non coding program" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("_ computational in coding program") OR ("using computation in agile programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"_ computational in coding program\") OR (\"using computation in agile programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( _ computational in coding program ) OR ( using computation in agile programming ))*.