Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"_ computational efficiency computational code" » "_ operational efficiency computational code" (Expand search), "_ computational neuroscience computational code" (Expand search), "_ nutritional efficiency computational code" (Expand search), "_ computational efficient computational code" (Expand search), "_ computational efficient computation code" (Expand search), "_ computational efficiency operational code" (Expand search), "_ computational efficiency computational model" (Expand search), "_ computational efficiency computational cost" (Expand search), "_ computational efficiency computational models" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"_ computational efficiency computational code\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( _ computational efficiency computational code ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("_ computational efficiency computational code") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.