Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"_ computation using explosive programming" » "_ computation using inclusive programming" (Expand search), "_ computation using copositive programming" (Expand search), "_ computation using expression programming" (Expand search), "_ computations using explosive programming" (Expand search), "_ computation in explosive programming" (Expand search), "_ composition using explosive programming" (Expand search), "_ computation using exclusive programming" (Expand search), "_ computation point explosive programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"_ computation using explosive programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( _ computation using explosive programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("_ computation using explosive programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.