Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"_ computation using coding proposals" » "_ computations using coding proposals" (Expand search), "_ computation in coding proposals" (Expand search), "_ composition using coding proposals" (Expand search), "_ computation using zoning proposals" (Expand search), "_ computation using bidding proposals" (Expand search), "_ computation using binding proposals" (Expand search), "_ computation using coping proposals" (Expand search), "_ computation using coating proposals" (Expand search), "_ computation using cooking proposals" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("_ computation using coding proposals") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"_ computation using coding proposals\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( _ computation using coding proposals ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.