Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"_ computation in type programming" » "_ computation in typed programming" (Expand search), "_ computation in the programming" (Expand search), "_ computation in time programming" (Expand search), "_ computation and type programming" (Expand search), "_ computation of type programming" (Expand search), "_ imputation in type programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"_ computation in type programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( _ computation in type programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("_ computation in type programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.