Discussion about the feasibility of the employment of natural language processing tools in the identification of binding decisions in judicial processes

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Boeing, Daniel Henrique Arruda
Publication Date: 2020
Other Authors: Quadros, Luccas Fernandes de, Melo, Tiago Ribeiro Alves de, Matos, Renata
Format: Article
Language: por
Source: Democracia Digital e Governo Eletrônico
Download full: https://buscalegis.ufsc.br/revistas/index.php/observatoriodoegov/article/view/346
Summary: This paper discusses the use of Natural Language Processing (NLP) tools on the identification of binding precedents themes in legal documents. Therefore, there are legal and technical explanations. From the legal standpoint, the paper examines the: (a)  Binding Precedents System instituted by the Brazilian Code of Civil Procedure from 2015; (b) the new legal mindset required to its adoption; and (c) how it aims to provide more celerity, isonomy and legal security to judgements. From the technical standpoint, NLP tools are presented in order to analyse the feasibility of their implementation on the identification of the convergence between the precedent and the document as a support to expert agents’ decision making. Finally, dynamics and results from LEIA Precedents are presented, a real-case project through which this strategy was successfully carried out.
id USC-29_2650d8bcad77fc0a56a8f1999aedac56
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.www.buscalegis.ufsc.br:article/346
network_acronym_str USC-29
network_name_str Revista Democracia Digital e Governo Eletrônico
repository_id_str
spelling Discussion about the feasibility of the employment of natural language processing tools in the identification of binding decisions in judicial processesDiscussão sobre a viabilidade técnica e jurídica para a aplicação de processamento de linguagem natural em decisões vinculantes em processos judiciaisThis paper discusses the use of Natural Language Processing (NLP) tools on the identification of binding precedents themes in legal documents. Therefore, there are legal and technical explanations. From the legal standpoint, the paper examines the: (a)  Binding Precedents System instituted by the Brazilian Code of Civil Procedure from 2015; (b) the new legal mindset required to its adoption; and (c) how it aims to provide more celerity, isonomy and legal security to judgements. From the technical standpoint, NLP tools are presented in order to analyse the feasibility of their implementation on the identification of the convergence between the precedent and the document as a support to expert agents’ decision making. Finally, dynamics and results from LEIA Precedents are presented, a real-case project through which this strategy was successfully carried out.Este artigo discute a utilização de ferramentas de Processamento de Linguagem Natural (PLN) na identificação de temas de decisões vinculantes em documentos jurídicos. Para tanto, são realizadas explanações de ordem jurídica e técnica. Sob a ótica jurídica, discorre-se em linhas gerais sobre o Sistema de precedentes vinculantes trazido pelo Código de Processo Civil/2015, as mudanças de ordem de cultura jurídica que sua adoção requer e como isso busca conferir maior celeridade, isonomia e segurança jurídica à prestação jurisdicional. Do ponto de vista técnico, são apresentadas ferramentas de PLN para se examinar a viabilidade da aplicação destas na identificação de convergência documento-tema como um apoio à tomada de decisão de agentes especialistas. Por fim, são apresentados resultados e dinâmicas de um projeto real, o LEIA Precedentes em que esta estratégia foi executada com sucesso.Revista Democracia Digital e Governo Eletrônico2020-11-26info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://buscalegis.ufsc.br/revistas/index.php/observatoriodoegov/article/view/346Revista Democracia Digital e Governo Eletrônico; v. 2 n. 20 (2020): Edição Especial do 31º Encontro Ibero Americano de Governo Eletrônico e Inclusão Digital - "Inteligência artificial, processo eletrônico e informatização no Poder Judiciário"; 25-462175-9391reponame:Democracia Digital e Governo Eletrônicoinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://buscalegis.ufsc.br/revistas/index.php/observatoriodoegov/article/view/346/222Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Democracia Digital e Governo Eletrônicoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBoeing, Daniel Henrique ArrudaQuadros, Luccas Fernandes deMelo, Tiago Ribeiro Alves deMatos, Renata2022-08-15T15:41:14Zoai:ojs.www.buscalegis.ufsc.br:article/346Revistahttps://buscalegis.ufsc.br/revistas/index.php/observatoriodoegov/indexPUBhttps://buscalegis.ufsc.br/revistas/index.php/observatoriodoegov/oaisites@sistemas.ufsc.br || isabelasabo@gmail.com || aires.rover@gmail.com || santos.paloma@gmail.com2175-93912175-9391opendoar:2022-08-15T15:41:14Democracia Digital e Governo Eletrônico - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Discussion about the feasibility of the employment of natural language processing tools in the identification of binding decisions in judicial processes
Discussão sobre a viabilidade técnica e jurídica para a aplicação de processamento de linguagem natural em decisões vinculantes em processos judiciais
title Discussion about the feasibility of the employment of natural language processing tools in the identification of binding decisions in judicial processes
spellingShingle Discussion about the feasibility of the employment of natural language processing tools in the identification of binding decisions in judicial processes
Boeing, Daniel Henrique Arruda
title_short Discussion about the feasibility of the employment of natural language processing tools in the identification of binding decisions in judicial processes
title_full Discussion about the feasibility of the employment of natural language processing tools in the identification of binding decisions in judicial processes
title_fullStr Discussion about the feasibility of the employment of natural language processing tools in the identification of binding decisions in judicial processes
title_full_unstemmed Discussion about the feasibility of the employment of natural language processing tools in the identification of binding decisions in judicial processes
title_sort Discussion about the feasibility of the employment of natural language processing tools in the identification of binding decisions in judicial processes
author Boeing, Daniel Henrique Arruda
author_facet Boeing, Daniel Henrique Arruda
Quadros, Luccas Fernandes de
Melo, Tiago Ribeiro Alves de
Matos, Renata
author_role author
author2 Quadros, Luccas Fernandes de
Melo, Tiago Ribeiro Alves de
Matos, Renata
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Boeing, Daniel Henrique Arruda
Quadros, Luccas Fernandes de
Melo, Tiago Ribeiro Alves de
Matos, Renata
description This paper discusses the use of Natural Language Processing (NLP) tools on the identification of binding precedents themes in legal documents. Therefore, there are legal and technical explanations. From the legal standpoint, the paper examines the: (a)  Binding Precedents System instituted by the Brazilian Code of Civil Procedure from 2015; (b) the new legal mindset required to its adoption; and (c) how it aims to provide more celerity, isonomy and legal security to judgements. From the technical standpoint, NLP tools are presented in order to analyse the feasibility of their implementation on the identification of the convergence between the precedent and the document as a support to expert agents’ decision making. Finally, dynamics and results from LEIA Precedents are presented, a real-case project through which this strategy was successfully carried out.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-11-26
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://buscalegis.ufsc.br/revistas/index.php/observatoriodoegov/article/view/346
url https://buscalegis.ufsc.br/revistas/index.php/observatoriodoegov/article/view/346
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://buscalegis.ufsc.br/revistas/index.php/observatoriodoegov/article/view/346/222
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Democracia Digital e Governo Eletrônico
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Democracia Digital e Governo Eletrônico
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Revista Democracia Digital e Governo Eletrônico
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Revista Democracia Digital e Governo Eletrônico
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Democracia Digital e Governo Eletrônico; v. 2 n. 20 (2020): Edição Especial do 31º Encontro Ibero Americano de Governo Eletrônico e Inclusão Digital - "Inteligência artificial, processo eletrônico e informatização no Poder Judiciário"; 25-46
2175-9391
reponame:Democracia Digital e Governo Eletrônico
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron:UFSC
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron_str UFSC
institution UFSC
reponame_str Democracia Digital e Governo Eletrônico
collection Democracia Digital e Governo Eletrônico
repository.name.fl_str_mv Democracia Digital e Governo Eletrônico - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv sites@sistemas.ufsc.br || isabelasabo@gmail.com || aires.rover@gmail.com || santos.paloma@gmail.com
_version_ 1839531287921033216

Similar Items