How to decide between buying or renovating agricultural tractors?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Vidal, Diego Onofre [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Silva, Rouverson Pereira da [UNESP], Oliveira, Bruno Rocca de [UNESP], Conceicao, Elimar Veloso, Santos, David Ferreira Lopes [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: https://hdl.handle.net/11449/299730
Resumo: Deciding whether to buy or rebuild a tractor and when to do so is an empirical problem for farmers and/or rural administrators, whose analytical methods explored in the literature do not provide a clear approach to the operational and economic effects in the short and long term, despite its importance to the competitiveness of the activity. If the cost of replacing the agricultural tractors used in spraying the citrus crop could be more helpful than the reform of these, this study aimed to build and validate an economic evaluation method to support the decision to buy new or replace existing wheel tractors. To achieve such goals, a database with quarterly operational and financial information on 47 tractors between 2009 and 2017 was constructed. The method combined the use of an empirical, with the use of model panel-data regression, combining cross-sectional data with time series, to establish the actual cost information to be used in the model, and finally, implement the discounted cash flow, in which all uncertainties were controlled using a Monte Carlo simulation. The results indicated that the best decision is to purchase new equipment only after the fourth year of use. It stands out in the study findings, the impact of tax benefits and the resale of tractors were relevant to the cash flow, as well as the increase in maintenance costs over time. The economic evaluation method applied in this study can help rural producers and administrators in the decision-making process for investments in fixed assets and innovative technologies, thereby enabling them to be more accurate in their investment decisions. Technological progress increases the obsolescence rate of agricultural machinery and equipment whose paradigm referring to replacement was restricted to costs and operating conditions. In this study, it was found that the aggregate impact of expenditures and tax benefits had significant relevance on cash flow, therefore, should guide the analysis to create economic value.
id UNSP_f7bdd5fb47ea3b3154aa605e475670f6
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/299730
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling How to decide between buying or renovating agricultural tractors?ValuationAgricultural machineryInvestment decisionsDeciding whether to buy or rebuild a tractor and when to do so is an empirical problem for farmers and/or rural administrators, whose analytical methods explored in the literature do not provide a clear approach to the operational and economic effects in the short and long term, despite its importance to the competitiveness of the activity. If the cost of replacing the agricultural tractors used in spraying the citrus crop could be more helpful than the reform of these, this study aimed to build and validate an economic evaluation method to support the decision to buy new or replace existing wheel tractors. To achieve such goals, a database with quarterly operational and financial information on 47 tractors between 2009 and 2017 was constructed. The method combined the use of an empirical, with the use of model panel-data regression, combining cross-sectional data with time series, to establish the actual cost information to be used in the model, and finally, implement the discounted cash flow, in which all uncertainties were controlled using a Monte Carlo simulation. The results indicated that the best decision is to purchase new equipment only after the fourth year of use. It stands out in the study findings, the impact of tax benefits and the resale of tractors were relevant to the cash flow, as well as the increase in maintenance costs over time. The economic evaluation method applied in this study can help rural producers and administrators in the decision-making process for investments in fixed assets and innovative technologies, thereby enabling them to be more accurate in their investment decisions. Technological progress increases the obsolescence rate of agricultural machinery and equipment whose paradigm referring to replacement was restricted to costs and operating conditions. In this study, it was found that the aggregate impact of expenditures and tax benefits had significant relevance on cash flow, therefore, should guide the analysis to create economic value.Sao Paulo State Univ Unesp, Via Acesso Prof Paulo Donato Castellane S-N, BR-14884900 Jaboticabal, SP, BrazilUniv Sao Paulo, Av Bandeirantes 3900, BR-14040905 Ribeirao Preto, SP, BrazilSao Paulo State Univ Unesp, Via Acesso Prof Paulo Donato Castellane S-N, BR-14884900 Jaboticabal, SP, BrazilUniv Fed Rural Pernambuco, Dept AdministracaoUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Universidade de São Paulo (USP)Vidal, Diego Onofre [UNESP]Silva, Rouverson Pereira da [UNESP]Oliveira, Bruno Rocca de [UNESP]Conceicao, Elimar VelosoSantos, David Ferreira Lopes [UNESP]2025-04-29T18:43:17Z2022-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article350-377Custos E Agronegocio On Line. Bairro De Dois Irmaos: Univ Fed Rural Pernambuco, Dept Administracao, v. 18, n. 3, p. 350-377, 2022.1808-2882https://hdl.handle.net/11449/299730WOS:001046672600019Web of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengCustos E Agronegocio On Lineinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2025-04-30T13:24:22Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/299730Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462025-04-30T13:24:22Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv How to decide between buying or renovating agricultural tractors?
title How to decide between buying or renovating agricultural tractors?
spellingShingle How to decide between buying or renovating agricultural tractors?
Vidal, Diego Onofre [UNESP]
Valuation
Agricultural machinery
Investment decisions
title_short How to decide between buying or renovating agricultural tractors?
title_full How to decide between buying or renovating agricultural tractors?
title_fullStr How to decide between buying or renovating agricultural tractors?
title_full_unstemmed How to decide between buying or renovating agricultural tractors?
title_sort How to decide between buying or renovating agricultural tractors?
author Vidal, Diego Onofre [UNESP]
author_facet Vidal, Diego Onofre [UNESP]
Silva, Rouverson Pereira da [UNESP]
Oliveira, Bruno Rocca de [UNESP]
Conceicao, Elimar Veloso
Santos, David Ferreira Lopes [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Silva, Rouverson Pereira da [UNESP]
Oliveira, Bruno Rocca de [UNESP]
Conceicao, Elimar Veloso
Santos, David Ferreira Lopes [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Vidal, Diego Onofre [UNESP]
Silva, Rouverson Pereira da [UNESP]
Oliveira, Bruno Rocca de [UNESP]
Conceicao, Elimar Veloso
Santos, David Ferreira Lopes [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Valuation
Agricultural machinery
Investment decisions
topic Valuation
Agricultural machinery
Investment decisions
description Deciding whether to buy or rebuild a tractor and when to do so is an empirical problem for farmers and/or rural administrators, whose analytical methods explored in the literature do not provide a clear approach to the operational and economic effects in the short and long term, despite its importance to the competitiveness of the activity. If the cost of replacing the agricultural tractors used in spraying the citrus crop could be more helpful than the reform of these, this study aimed to build and validate an economic evaluation method to support the decision to buy new or replace existing wheel tractors. To achieve such goals, a database with quarterly operational and financial information on 47 tractors between 2009 and 2017 was constructed. The method combined the use of an empirical, with the use of model panel-data regression, combining cross-sectional data with time series, to establish the actual cost information to be used in the model, and finally, implement the discounted cash flow, in which all uncertainties were controlled using a Monte Carlo simulation. The results indicated that the best decision is to purchase new equipment only after the fourth year of use. It stands out in the study findings, the impact of tax benefits and the resale of tractors were relevant to the cash flow, as well as the increase in maintenance costs over time. The economic evaluation method applied in this study can help rural producers and administrators in the decision-making process for investments in fixed assets and innovative technologies, thereby enabling them to be more accurate in their investment decisions. Technological progress increases the obsolescence rate of agricultural machinery and equipment whose paradigm referring to replacement was restricted to costs and operating conditions. In this study, it was found that the aggregate impact of expenditures and tax benefits had significant relevance on cash flow, therefore, should guide the analysis to create economic value.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-07-01
2025-04-29T18:43:17Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv Custos E Agronegocio On Line. Bairro De Dois Irmaos: Univ Fed Rural Pernambuco, Dept Administracao, v. 18, n. 3, p. 350-377, 2022.
1808-2882
https://hdl.handle.net/11449/299730
WOS:001046672600019
identifier_str_mv Custos E Agronegocio On Line. Bairro De Dois Irmaos: Univ Fed Rural Pernambuco, Dept Administracao, v. 18, n. 3, p. 350-377, 2022.
1808-2882
WOS:001046672600019
url https://hdl.handle.net/11449/299730
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Custos E Agronegocio On Line
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 350-377
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Univ Fed Rural Pernambuco, Dept Administracao
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Univ Fed Rural Pernambuco, Dept Administracao
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Web of Science
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositoriounesp@unesp.br
_version_ 1834482629457477632