Ovarian function and pregnancy rates in dairy goats that received 300 IU of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) intravaginally at the time of artificial insemination
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2023 |
Other Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | eng |
Source: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Download full: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2023.107061 https://hdl.handle.net/11449/299053 |
Summary: | Two experiments were carried out to evaluate the effects of administering 300 IU hCG intravaginally (i.vag.) at the time of artificial insemination (AI) on ovulatory response, luteal function and pregnancy rates in cyclic Alpine (A) and Saanen (S) goats. All animals received two i.m. injections of 37.5 μg of D-cloprostenol (Prolise®; Tecnopec, São Paulo, SP, Brazil) at 11.5-day (Experiments 1 and 2) or 7.5-day intervals (Experiment 2). One day after the onset of estrus (day of AI=D0), the goats were randomly allocated to one of the two groups that received: 300 IU hCG (Vetecor®; Hertape-Calier, São Paulo, SP, Brazil) i.vag. (G-hCG; Experiment 1: n = 12 A; Experiment 2: n = 80 A + 63 S) or 0.3 mL or saline solution i.vag. (G-Control; Experiment 1: n = 12 A; Experiment 2: n = 82 A + 65 S). Blood samples for measurements of circulating progesterone concentrations were drawn on both days of D-cloprostenol injections and on D3, D7, D10, D13 and D21 (Experiment 1). Transrectal ovarian ultrasonography was done on D7, D10, D13, D17 and D21 (Experiment 1), and pregnancy detection was performed on D60 (Experiment 2). In Experiment 1, there were no differences (P > 0.05) in the mean diameter of ovulatory follicles, timing and number of ovulations, and incidence of early luteal regression between the two groups of goats. However, the total luteal area on D17 and D21 and luteal vascularization on D10 and D13 were higher (P < 0.05) in G-hCG compared with G-Control does. In Experiment 2, the pregnancy rate was higher (P < 0.05) in G-hCG compared with G-Control goats (80.4% compared with 67.3%, respectively). Human chorionic gonadotropin (300 IU) given i.vag. at the time of AI did not alter ovulatory response or progesterone secretory ability of resultant corpora lutea nor did it completely prevent premature luteal regression, but it increased the luteal area and luteal vascularization as well as the conception rate in dairy goats (the latter by 13.1%). |
id |
UNSP_dce1b21fde62d2c2099b8d809baeb84b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/299053 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Ovarian function and pregnancy rates in dairy goats that received 300 IU of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) intravaginally at the time of artificial inseminationArtificial inseminationCorpus luteumHuman chorionic gonadotropinOvaryProgesteroneUltrasonographyTwo experiments were carried out to evaluate the effects of administering 300 IU hCG intravaginally (i.vag.) at the time of artificial insemination (AI) on ovulatory response, luteal function and pregnancy rates in cyclic Alpine (A) and Saanen (S) goats. All animals received two i.m. injections of 37.5 μg of D-cloprostenol (Prolise®; Tecnopec, São Paulo, SP, Brazil) at 11.5-day (Experiments 1 and 2) or 7.5-day intervals (Experiment 2). One day after the onset of estrus (day of AI=D0), the goats were randomly allocated to one of the two groups that received: 300 IU hCG (Vetecor®; Hertape-Calier, São Paulo, SP, Brazil) i.vag. (G-hCG; Experiment 1: n = 12 A; Experiment 2: n = 80 A + 63 S) or 0.3 mL or saline solution i.vag. (G-Control; Experiment 1: n = 12 A; Experiment 2: n = 82 A + 65 S). Blood samples for measurements of circulating progesterone concentrations were drawn on both days of D-cloprostenol injections and on D3, D7, D10, D13 and D21 (Experiment 1). Transrectal ovarian ultrasonography was done on D7, D10, D13, D17 and D21 (Experiment 1), and pregnancy detection was performed on D60 (Experiment 2). In Experiment 1, there were no differences (P > 0.05) in the mean diameter of ovulatory follicles, timing and number of ovulations, and incidence of early luteal regression between the two groups of goats. However, the total luteal area on D17 and D21 and luteal vascularization on D10 and D13 were higher (P < 0.05) in G-hCG compared with G-Control does. In Experiment 2, the pregnancy rate was higher (P < 0.05) in G-hCG compared with G-Control goats (80.4% compared with 67.3%, respectively). Human chorionic gonadotropin (300 IU) given i.vag. at the time of AI did not alter ovulatory response or progesterone secretory ability of resultant corpora lutea nor did it completely prevent premature luteal regression, but it increased the luteal area and luteal vascularization as well as the conception rate in dairy goats (the latter by 13.1%).Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG)Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa AgropecuáriaConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Departamento de Medicina Veterinária Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Av. Peter Henry Rolfs, s/n, MGUniversidade Federal Rural da Amazônia Campus Paragominas, Rodovia PA-256, s/n, PAFaculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias Universidade Estadual Paulista, Via de acesso Prof. Paulo Donato Castellane, s/n, SPFaculty of Veterinary Medicine Fluminense Federal University, Av. Vital Brasil Filho, 64, RJDepartment of Biomedical Sciences Ontario Veterinary College University of GuelphEmbrapa Caprinos e Ovinos, Estrada Sobral/Groaíras, km 04, CP 145, CEFaculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias Universidade Estadual Paulista, Via de acesso Prof. Paulo Donato Castellane, s/n, SPEmpresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária: 20.19.01.004.00.03.001CNPq: 403909/2021-0Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)Universidade Federal Rural da AmazôniaUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Fluminense Federal UniversityUniversity of GuelphEmpresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (EMBRAPA)Rodrigues, Juliana Nascimento DuarteGuimarães, José DomingosRangel, Paulo Sergio CerqueiraOliveira, Maria Emilia Franco [UNESP]Brandão, Felipe ZandonadiBartlewski, Pawel MieczyslawFonseca, Jeferson Ferreira2025-04-29T18:41:18Z2023-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2023.107061Small Ruminant Research, v. 227.0921-4488https://hdl.handle.net/11449/29905310.1016/j.smallrumres.2023.1070612-s2.0-85172483089Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengSmall Ruminant Researchinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2025-04-30T13:33:01Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/299053Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462025-04-30T13:33:01Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Ovarian function and pregnancy rates in dairy goats that received 300 IU of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) intravaginally at the time of artificial insemination |
title |
Ovarian function and pregnancy rates in dairy goats that received 300 IU of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) intravaginally at the time of artificial insemination |
spellingShingle |
Ovarian function and pregnancy rates in dairy goats that received 300 IU of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) intravaginally at the time of artificial insemination Rodrigues, Juliana Nascimento Duarte Artificial insemination Corpus luteum Human chorionic gonadotropin Ovary Progesterone Ultrasonography |
title_short |
Ovarian function and pregnancy rates in dairy goats that received 300 IU of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) intravaginally at the time of artificial insemination |
title_full |
Ovarian function and pregnancy rates in dairy goats that received 300 IU of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) intravaginally at the time of artificial insemination |
title_fullStr |
Ovarian function and pregnancy rates in dairy goats that received 300 IU of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) intravaginally at the time of artificial insemination |
title_full_unstemmed |
Ovarian function and pregnancy rates in dairy goats that received 300 IU of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) intravaginally at the time of artificial insemination |
title_sort |
Ovarian function and pregnancy rates in dairy goats that received 300 IU of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) intravaginally at the time of artificial insemination |
author |
Rodrigues, Juliana Nascimento Duarte |
author_facet |
Rodrigues, Juliana Nascimento Duarte Guimarães, José Domingos Rangel, Paulo Sergio Cerqueira Oliveira, Maria Emilia Franco [UNESP] Brandão, Felipe Zandonadi Bartlewski, Pawel Mieczyslaw Fonseca, Jeferson Ferreira |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Guimarães, José Domingos Rangel, Paulo Sergio Cerqueira Oliveira, Maria Emilia Franco [UNESP] Brandão, Felipe Zandonadi Bartlewski, Pawel Mieczyslaw Fonseca, Jeferson Ferreira |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV) Universidade Federal Rural da Amazônia Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) Fluminense Federal University University of Guelph Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (EMBRAPA) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Rodrigues, Juliana Nascimento Duarte Guimarães, José Domingos Rangel, Paulo Sergio Cerqueira Oliveira, Maria Emilia Franco [UNESP] Brandão, Felipe Zandonadi Bartlewski, Pawel Mieczyslaw Fonseca, Jeferson Ferreira |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Artificial insemination Corpus luteum Human chorionic gonadotropin Ovary Progesterone Ultrasonography |
topic |
Artificial insemination Corpus luteum Human chorionic gonadotropin Ovary Progesterone Ultrasonography |
description |
Two experiments were carried out to evaluate the effects of administering 300 IU hCG intravaginally (i.vag.) at the time of artificial insemination (AI) on ovulatory response, luteal function and pregnancy rates in cyclic Alpine (A) and Saanen (S) goats. All animals received two i.m. injections of 37.5 μg of D-cloprostenol (Prolise®; Tecnopec, São Paulo, SP, Brazil) at 11.5-day (Experiments 1 and 2) or 7.5-day intervals (Experiment 2). One day after the onset of estrus (day of AI=D0), the goats were randomly allocated to one of the two groups that received: 300 IU hCG (Vetecor®; Hertape-Calier, São Paulo, SP, Brazil) i.vag. (G-hCG; Experiment 1: n = 12 A; Experiment 2: n = 80 A + 63 S) or 0.3 mL or saline solution i.vag. (G-Control; Experiment 1: n = 12 A; Experiment 2: n = 82 A + 65 S). Blood samples for measurements of circulating progesterone concentrations were drawn on both days of D-cloprostenol injections and on D3, D7, D10, D13 and D21 (Experiment 1). Transrectal ovarian ultrasonography was done on D7, D10, D13, D17 and D21 (Experiment 1), and pregnancy detection was performed on D60 (Experiment 2). In Experiment 1, there were no differences (P > 0.05) in the mean diameter of ovulatory follicles, timing and number of ovulations, and incidence of early luteal regression between the two groups of goats. However, the total luteal area on D17 and D21 and luteal vascularization on D10 and D13 were higher (P < 0.05) in G-hCG compared with G-Control does. In Experiment 2, the pregnancy rate was higher (P < 0.05) in G-hCG compared with G-Control goats (80.4% compared with 67.3%, respectively). Human chorionic gonadotropin (300 IU) given i.vag. at the time of AI did not alter ovulatory response or progesterone secretory ability of resultant corpora lutea nor did it completely prevent premature luteal regression, but it increased the luteal area and luteal vascularization as well as the conception rate in dairy goats (the latter by 13.1%). |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-10-01 2025-04-29T18:41:18Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2023.107061 Small Ruminant Research, v. 227. 0921-4488 https://hdl.handle.net/11449/299053 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2023.107061 2-s2.0-85172483089 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2023.107061 https://hdl.handle.net/11449/299053 |
identifier_str_mv |
Small Ruminant Research, v. 227. 0921-4488 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2023.107061 2-s2.0-85172483089 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Small Ruminant Research |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositoriounesp@unesp.br |
_version_ |
1834482942293835776 |