Objective Tumor Response of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Obtained by Transarterial Radioembolization with Iodine-131-Lipiodol Versus Transarterial Chemoembolization for Patients with and without Portal Venous Thrombosis: A Controlled Interventional Trial

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Oliveira Ribeiro, Michele Costa de [UNESP]
Publication Date: 2024
Other Authors: Moda, Kerolyn Adorne [UNESP], Alvarez, Matheus, Koga, Katia Hiromoto [UNESP], Moriguchi, Sônia Marta [UNESP], Carvalho, Fábio Cardoso [UNESP], Pinheiro, Rafael Soares Nunes, Qi, Xingshun, Romeiro, Fernando Gomes [UNESP]
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Download full: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2023.10.029
https://hdl.handle.net/11449/305708
Summary: Rationale and Objectives: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment often requires transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). However, TACE efficacy is controversial in the presence of portal vein thrombosis (PVT). Although transarterial radioembolization (TARE) benefit was previously documented in PVT, neither the objective tumor response (OTR) after TARE with Iodine-131-lipiodol (131I-lipiodol) nor the PVT effect on the results of locoregional therapies was accurately measured in prospective clinical trials. The aim of this study was to compare OTR and survival obtained by TARE with 131I-lipiodol versus TACE in patients with cirrhosis and HCC, as well as between those with and without PVT. Materials and Methods: 33 patients were included, from whom 38 tumors were assessed. OTR was quantified by a special algorithm to measure hypervascular HCC tissue. Results: 19 tumors received each therapy. Nine subjects (27%) had PVT, most of them in the TARE group (p = 0.026). Mean OTR according to the tumor volumes was 24.2% ± 56% after TARE and 32.8% ± 48.9% after TACE, with no difference between the treatments (p = 0.616). Similar values were also observed between those with and without PVT (p = 0.704). Mean survival was 340 days and did not differ between the two treatments (p = 0.596), but was 194 days in PVT cases (p = 0.007). Conclusions: This is the first study in which OTR obtained by TARE with 131I-lipiodol is accurately measured. Additionally, PVT impact on survival after TARE and TACE was precisely documented. Although the TARE group had more PVT subjects (who had shorter survival), TARE and TACE achieved similar OTR and OS rates.
id UNSP_cd34d1cff2849e10731dde82741bf619
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/305708
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Objective Tumor Response of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Obtained by Transarterial Radioembolization with Iodine-131-Lipiodol Versus Transarterial Chemoembolization for Patients with and without Portal Venous Thrombosis: A Controlled Interventional TrialHepatocellular carcinomaObjective tumor responsePortal vein thrombosisTransarterial chemoembolizationTransarterial radioembolizationRationale and Objectives: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment often requires transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). However, TACE efficacy is controversial in the presence of portal vein thrombosis (PVT). Although transarterial radioembolization (TARE) benefit was previously documented in PVT, neither the objective tumor response (OTR) after TARE with Iodine-131-lipiodol (131I-lipiodol) nor the PVT effect on the results of locoregional therapies was accurately measured in prospective clinical trials. The aim of this study was to compare OTR and survival obtained by TARE with 131I-lipiodol versus TACE in patients with cirrhosis and HCC, as well as between those with and without PVT. Materials and Methods: 33 patients were included, from whom 38 tumors were assessed. OTR was quantified by a special algorithm to measure hypervascular HCC tissue. Results: 19 tumors received each therapy. Nine subjects (27%) had PVT, most of them in the TARE group (p = 0.026). Mean OTR according to the tumor volumes was 24.2% ± 56% after TARE and 32.8% ± 48.9% after TACE, with no difference between the treatments (p = 0.616). Similar values were also observed between those with and without PVT (p = 0.704). Mean survival was 340 days and did not differ between the two treatments (p = 0.596), but was 194 days in PVT cases (p = 0.007). Conclusions: This is the first study in which OTR obtained by TARE with 131I-lipiodol is accurately measured. Additionally, PVT impact on survival after TARE and TACE was precisely documented. Although the TARE group had more PVT subjects (who had shorter survival), TARE and TACE achieved similar OTR and OS rates.Department of Internal Medicine Sao Paulo State University (UNESP)Center of Medical Physics and Radiation Protection Clinical Hospital at Botucatu School of Medicine-HC-FMBDepartment of Infectology Dermatology Imaging Diagnosis and Radiotherapy Sao Paulo State University (UNESP)Liver and Digestive Organs Transplantation Division Gastroenterology Department Clinical Hospital of Sao Paulo University - HCFMUSPDepartment of Gastroenterology General Hospital of Northern Theater Command (formerly General Hospital of Shenyang Military Area)Department of Internal Medicine Sao Paulo State University (UNESP)Department of Infectology Dermatology Imaging Diagnosis and Radiotherapy Sao Paulo State University (UNESP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Clinical Hospital at Botucatu School of Medicine-HC-FMBUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)General Hospital of Northern Theater Command (formerly General Hospital of Shenyang Military Area)Oliveira Ribeiro, Michele Costa de [UNESP]Moda, Kerolyn Adorne [UNESP]Alvarez, MatheusKoga, Katia Hiromoto [UNESP]Moriguchi, Sônia Marta [UNESP]Carvalho, Fábio Cardoso [UNESP]Pinheiro, Rafael Soares NunesQi, XingshunRomeiro, Fernando Gomes [UNESP]2025-04-29T20:03:57Z2024-05-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article1839-1848http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2023.10.029Academic Radiology, v. 31, n. 5, p. 1839-1848, 2024.1878-40461076-6332https://hdl.handle.net/11449/30570810.1016/j.acra.2023.10.0292-s2.0-85178362347Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengAcademic Radiologyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2025-04-30T14:35:51Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/305708Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462025-04-30T14:35:51Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Objective Tumor Response of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Obtained by Transarterial Radioembolization with Iodine-131-Lipiodol Versus Transarterial Chemoembolization for Patients with and without Portal Venous Thrombosis: A Controlled Interventional Trial
title Objective Tumor Response of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Obtained by Transarterial Radioembolization with Iodine-131-Lipiodol Versus Transarterial Chemoembolization for Patients with and without Portal Venous Thrombosis: A Controlled Interventional Trial
spellingShingle Objective Tumor Response of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Obtained by Transarterial Radioembolization with Iodine-131-Lipiodol Versus Transarterial Chemoembolization for Patients with and without Portal Venous Thrombosis: A Controlled Interventional Trial
Oliveira Ribeiro, Michele Costa de [UNESP]
Hepatocellular carcinoma
Objective tumor response
Portal vein thrombosis
Transarterial chemoembolization
Transarterial radioembolization
title_short Objective Tumor Response of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Obtained by Transarterial Radioembolization with Iodine-131-Lipiodol Versus Transarterial Chemoembolization for Patients with and without Portal Venous Thrombosis: A Controlled Interventional Trial
title_full Objective Tumor Response of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Obtained by Transarterial Radioembolization with Iodine-131-Lipiodol Versus Transarterial Chemoembolization for Patients with and without Portal Venous Thrombosis: A Controlled Interventional Trial
title_fullStr Objective Tumor Response of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Obtained by Transarterial Radioembolization with Iodine-131-Lipiodol Versus Transarterial Chemoembolization for Patients with and without Portal Venous Thrombosis: A Controlled Interventional Trial
title_full_unstemmed Objective Tumor Response of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Obtained by Transarterial Radioembolization with Iodine-131-Lipiodol Versus Transarterial Chemoembolization for Patients with and without Portal Venous Thrombosis: A Controlled Interventional Trial
title_sort Objective Tumor Response of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Obtained by Transarterial Radioembolization with Iodine-131-Lipiodol Versus Transarterial Chemoembolization for Patients with and without Portal Venous Thrombosis: A Controlled Interventional Trial
author Oliveira Ribeiro, Michele Costa de [UNESP]
author_facet Oliveira Ribeiro, Michele Costa de [UNESP]
Moda, Kerolyn Adorne [UNESP]
Alvarez, Matheus
Koga, Katia Hiromoto [UNESP]
Moriguchi, Sônia Marta [UNESP]
Carvalho, Fábio Cardoso [UNESP]
Pinheiro, Rafael Soares Nunes
Qi, Xingshun
Romeiro, Fernando Gomes [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Moda, Kerolyn Adorne [UNESP]
Alvarez, Matheus
Koga, Katia Hiromoto [UNESP]
Moriguchi, Sônia Marta [UNESP]
Carvalho, Fábio Cardoso [UNESP]
Pinheiro, Rafael Soares Nunes
Qi, Xingshun
Romeiro, Fernando Gomes [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
Clinical Hospital at Botucatu School of Medicine-HC-FMB
Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
General Hospital of Northern Theater Command (formerly General Hospital of Shenyang Military Area)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Oliveira Ribeiro, Michele Costa de [UNESP]
Moda, Kerolyn Adorne [UNESP]
Alvarez, Matheus
Koga, Katia Hiromoto [UNESP]
Moriguchi, Sônia Marta [UNESP]
Carvalho, Fábio Cardoso [UNESP]
Pinheiro, Rafael Soares Nunes
Qi, Xingshun
Romeiro, Fernando Gomes [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Hepatocellular carcinoma
Objective tumor response
Portal vein thrombosis
Transarterial chemoembolization
Transarterial radioembolization
topic Hepatocellular carcinoma
Objective tumor response
Portal vein thrombosis
Transarterial chemoembolization
Transarterial radioembolization
description Rationale and Objectives: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment often requires transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). However, TACE efficacy is controversial in the presence of portal vein thrombosis (PVT). Although transarterial radioembolization (TARE) benefit was previously documented in PVT, neither the objective tumor response (OTR) after TARE with Iodine-131-lipiodol (131I-lipiodol) nor the PVT effect on the results of locoregional therapies was accurately measured in prospective clinical trials. The aim of this study was to compare OTR and survival obtained by TARE with 131I-lipiodol versus TACE in patients with cirrhosis and HCC, as well as between those with and without PVT. Materials and Methods: 33 patients were included, from whom 38 tumors were assessed. OTR was quantified by a special algorithm to measure hypervascular HCC tissue. Results: 19 tumors received each therapy. Nine subjects (27%) had PVT, most of them in the TARE group (p = 0.026). Mean OTR according to the tumor volumes was 24.2% ± 56% after TARE and 32.8% ± 48.9% after TACE, with no difference between the treatments (p = 0.616). Similar values were also observed between those with and without PVT (p = 0.704). Mean survival was 340 days and did not differ between the two treatments (p = 0.596), but was 194 days in PVT cases (p = 0.007). Conclusions: This is the first study in which OTR obtained by TARE with 131I-lipiodol is accurately measured. Additionally, PVT impact on survival after TARE and TACE was precisely documented. Although the TARE group had more PVT subjects (who had shorter survival), TARE and TACE achieved similar OTR and OS rates.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-05-01
2025-04-29T20:03:57Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2023.10.029
Academic Radiology, v. 31, n. 5, p. 1839-1848, 2024.
1878-4046
1076-6332
https://hdl.handle.net/11449/305708
10.1016/j.acra.2023.10.029
2-s2.0-85178362347
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2023.10.029
https://hdl.handle.net/11449/305708
identifier_str_mv Academic Radiology, v. 31, n. 5, p. 1839-1848, 2024.
1878-4046
1076-6332
10.1016/j.acra.2023.10.029
2-s2.0-85178362347
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Academic Radiology
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 1839-1848
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositoriounesp@unesp.br
_version_ 1834482935715069952