Fire-triggered flowering is the dominant post-fire strategy in a tropical savanna

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: L. Zirondi, Heloiza [UNESP]
Publication Date: 2021
Other Authors: Ooi, Mark K. J., Fidelis, Alessandra [UNESP]
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Download full: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jvs.12995
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/206238
Summary: Questions: In fire-prone ecosystems, fire can enhance the flowering and fruiting of many species, a strategy assumed to be well represented in savanna. Despite this, there are surprisingly few studies assessing how prevalent fire-stimulated flowering is. Thus, we asked: (a) are there differences in the reproductive phenology of Cerrado plants between recently burned and unburned areas; (b) how does fire affect the speed of flowering and how does this differ between growth forms; and (c) what are the post-fire flowering (PFF) strategies of Cerrado species and is there evidence for high proportions of obligate PFF?. Location: Open savannas (campo sujo in the Cerrado) in Central Brazil (Reserva Natural Serra do Tombador — RNST, 13°35–13°38' S and 47°45'–47°51' W). Methods: We established six plots, three recently and frequently burned (FB) and three excluded from fire for six years (E). In all treatments, the number of species flowering and fruiting was counted every 15 days for three months, and then at six, nine and 12 months after fire. We also counted the number of reproductive and vegetative shoots in 10 subplots (1 m × 1 m) per plot. Results: Approximately 66% of species studied were fire-stimulated, with half of these only flowering after fire (obligate PFF). Fire-enhanced flowering was rapid, with the clearest differences between burned and unburned plots seen in the first 30 days, and up to three months after fire, where there were up to two times more species flowering in the FB than E areas. Conclusions: The extremely high proportion of PFF species, at least five times that reported for heathlands and other shrub communities, highlights the role that short-interval fire regimes have in savanna ecosystems, selecting for resprouting life forms and PFF dominance, particularly in herbaceous species. Rapid post-fire reproduction may be a strategy to disperse large quantities of seed into an environment with a small recruitment window.
id UNSP_ad78918a873db16be0aeccb8741235f7
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/206238
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Fire-triggered flowering is the dominant post-fire strategy in a tropical savannacampo rupestreCerradofirefruiting increaseherbaceous plantsopen savannaspost-fire floweringreproductive phenologyQuestions: In fire-prone ecosystems, fire can enhance the flowering and fruiting of many species, a strategy assumed to be well represented in savanna. Despite this, there are surprisingly few studies assessing how prevalent fire-stimulated flowering is. Thus, we asked: (a) are there differences in the reproductive phenology of Cerrado plants between recently burned and unburned areas; (b) how does fire affect the speed of flowering and how does this differ between growth forms; and (c) what are the post-fire flowering (PFF) strategies of Cerrado species and is there evidence for high proportions of obligate PFF?. Location: Open savannas (campo sujo in the Cerrado) in Central Brazil (Reserva Natural Serra do Tombador — RNST, 13°35–13°38' S and 47°45'–47°51' W). Methods: We established six plots, three recently and frequently burned (FB) and three excluded from fire for six years (E). In all treatments, the number of species flowering and fruiting was counted every 15 days for three months, and then at six, nine and 12 months after fire. We also counted the number of reproductive and vegetative shoots in 10 subplots (1 m × 1 m) per plot. Results: Approximately 66% of species studied were fire-stimulated, with half of these only flowering after fire (obligate PFF). Fire-enhanced flowering was rapid, with the clearest differences between burned and unburned plots seen in the first 30 days, and up to three months after fire, where there were up to two times more species flowering in the FB than E areas. Conclusions: The extremely high proportion of PFF species, at least five times that reported for heathlands and other shrub communities, highlights the role that short-interval fire regimes have in savanna ecosystems, selecting for resprouting life forms and PFF dominance, particularly in herbaceous species. Rapid post-fire reproduction may be a strategy to disperse large quantities of seed into an environment with a small recruitment window.Fundação Grupo Boticário de Proteção à NaturezaFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Lab of Vegetation Ecology Instituto de Biociências Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Centre for Ecosystem Science School of Biological Earth and Environmental Sciences University of New South Wales (UNSW)New South Wales Bushfire Risk Management Research HubLab of Vegetation Ecology Instituto de Biociências Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Fundação Grupo Boticário de Proteção à Natureza: 0153_2011_PRFAPESP: BEPE 2018/08017-3CNPq: CNPq 303988/2018-5FAPESP: FAPESP 2015/06743-0FAPESP: FAPESP 2017/16149-4Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)University of New South Wales (UNSW)New South Wales Bushfire Risk Management Research HubL. Zirondi, Heloiza [UNESP]Ooi, Mark K. J.Fidelis, Alessandra [UNESP]2021-06-25T10:28:49Z2021-06-25T10:28:49Z2021-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jvs.12995Journal of Vegetation Science, v. 32, n. 2, 2021.1654-11031100-9233http://hdl.handle.net/11449/20623810.1111/jvs.129952-s2.0-85104758191Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal of Vegetation Scienceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-10-23T00:57:27Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/206238Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462021-10-23T00:57:27Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Fire-triggered flowering is the dominant post-fire strategy in a tropical savanna
title Fire-triggered flowering is the dominant post-fire strategy in a tropical savanna
spellingShingle Fire-triggered flowering is the dominant post-fire strategy in a tropical savanna
L. Zirondi, Heloiza [UNESP]
campo rupestre
Cerrado
fire
fruiting increase
herbaceous plants
open savannas
post-fire flowering
reproductive phenology
title_short Fire-triggered flowering is the dominant post-fire strategy in a tropical savanna
title_full Fire-triggered flowering is the dominant post-fire strategy in a tropical savanna
title_fullStr Fire-triggered flowering is the dominant post-fire strategy in a tropical savanna
title_full_unstemmed Fire-triggered flowering is the dominant post-fire strategy in a tropical savanna
title_sort Fire-triggered flowering is the dominant post-fire strategy in a tropical savanna
author L. Zirondi, Heloiza [UNESP]
author_facet L. Zirondi, Heloiza [UNESP]
Ooi, Mark K. J.
Fidelis, Alessandra [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Ooi, Mark K. J.
Fidelis, Alessandra [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
University of New South Wales (UNSW)
New South Wales Bushfire Risk Management Research Hub
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv L. Zirondi, Heloiza [UNESP]
Ooi, Mark K. J.
Fidelis, Alessandra [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv campo rupestre
Cerrado
fire
fruiting increase
herbaceous plants
open savannas
post-fire flowering
reproductive phenology
topic campo rupestre
Cerrado
fire
fruiting increase
herbaceous plants
open savannas
post-fire flowering
reproductive phenology
description Questions: In fire-prone ecosystems, fire can enhance the flowering and fruiting of many species, a strategy assumed to be well represented in savanna. Despite this, there are surprisingly few studies assessing how prevalent fire-stimulated flowering is. Thus, we asked: (a) are there differences in the reproductive phenology of Cerrado plants between recently burned and unburned areas; (b) how does fire affect the speed of flowering and how does this differ between growth forms; and (c) what are the post-fire flowering (PFF) strategies of Cerrado species and is there evidence for high proportions of obligate PFF?. Location: Open savannas (campo sujo in the Cerrado) in Central Brazil (Reserva Natural Serra do Tombador — RNST, 13°35–13°38' S and 47°45'–47°51' W). Methods: We established six plots, three recently and frequently burned (FB) and three excluded from fire for six years (E). In all treatments, the number of species flowering and fruiting was counted every 15 days for three months, and then at six, nine and 12 months after fire. We also counted the number of reproductive and vegetative shoots in 10 subplots (1 m × 1 m) per plot. Results: Approximately 66% of species studied were fire-stimulated, with half of these only flowering after fire (obligate PFF). Fire-enhanced flowering was rapid, with the clearest differences between burned and unburned plots seen in the first 30 days, and up to three months after fire, where there were up to two times more species flowering in the FB than E areas. Conclusions: The extremely high proportion of PFF species, at least five times that reported for heathlands and other shrub communities, highlights the role that short-interval fire regimes have in savanna ecosystems, selecting for resprouting life forms and PFF dominance, particularly in herbaceous species. Rapid post-fire reproduction may be a strategy to disperse large quantities of seed into an environment with a small recruitment window.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-06-25T10:28:49Z
2021-06-25T10:28:49Z
2021-03-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jvs.12995
Journal of Vegetation Science, v. 32, n. 2, 2021.
1654-1103
1100-9233
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/206238
10.1111/jvs.12995
2-s2.0-85104758191
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jvs.12995
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/206238
identifier_str_mv Journal of Vegetation Science, v. 32, n. 2, 2021.
1654-1103
1100-9233
10.1111/jvs.12995
2-s2.0-85104758191
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Vegetation Science
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositoriounesp@unesp.br
_version_ 1834483945393094656