Multiple response optimization: Analysis of genetic programming for symbolic regression and assessment of desirability functions

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Gomes, Fabricio M.
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Pereira, Felix M., Silva, Aneirson F., Silva, Messias B.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2019.05.002
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/184559
Resumo: Multiple responses optimization (MRO) consists in the search for the best settings in an problem with conflicting responses. MRO is performed following the steps: experimental design; experimental data gathering; mathematical models building; statistical validation of models; agglutination of the models responses in only one function to be optimized; optimization of agglutinated function; experimental validation of the best conditions. This work selected two MRO cases from literature aiming to compare two methods of mathematical models building and two agglutinating functions to assess the best one among the four possible combinations. The methods used in mathematical models building were the ordinary least squares performed in Minitab (v. 17) and genetic programming performed in Eureqa Formulize (v. 1.24.0). The assessment of the best method for building mathematical models was performed using the Akaike Information Criterion. The responses agglutination were performed using the desirability and modified desirability functions. In all MRO cases, the optimization step was performed by generalized reduced gradient method on Microsoft Excel (TM) software. The average percentage distance between predicted and experimental results was used to both assess the best agglutination function and verify the effect of the method used in the building of the mathematical models about its fitness to estimate the best condition close to that one obtained on experimental validation step. The obtained results suggest as the better strategy for multiple responses optimization the use, jointly, of genetic programming to mathematical models building and the modified desirability function to responses agglutination. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
id UNSP_3761982f4bfe74954e441e14e8d9d4b0
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/184559
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Multiple response optimization: Analysis of genetic programming for symbolic regression and assessment of desirability functionsOptimizationGenetic programmingDesirability functionModelingMultiple responses optimization (MRO) consists in the search for the best settings in an problem with conflicting responses. MRO is performed following the steps: experimental design; experimental data gathering; mathematical models building; statistical validation of models; agglutination of the models responses in only one function to be optimized; optimization of agglutinated function; experimental validation of the best conditions. This work selected two MRO cases from literature aiming to compare two methods of mathematical models building and two agglutinating functions to assess the best one among the four possible combinations. The methods used in mathematical models building were the ordinary least squares performed in Minitab (v. 17) and genetic programming performed in Eureqa Formulize (v. 1.24.0). The assessment of the best method for building mathematical models was performed using the Akaike Information Criterion. The responses agglutination were performed using the desirability and modified desirability functions. In all MRO cases, the optimization step was performed by generalized reduced gradient method on Microsoft Excel (TM) software. The average percentage distance between predicted and experimental results was used to both assess the best agglutination function and verify the effect of the method used in the building of the mathematical models about its fitness to estimate the best condition close to that one obtained on experimental validation step. The obtained results suggest as the better strategy for multiple responses optimization the use, jointly, of genetic programming to mathematical models building and the modified desirability function to responses agglutination. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.Univ Sao Paulo, Engn Sch Lorena, Estr Municipal Campinho S-N, BR-12602810 Lorena, SP, BrazilSao Paulo State Univ, Fac Engn Guaratingueta, Ave Doutor Ariberto Pereira da Cunha 333, BR-12516410 Guaratingueta, SP, BrazilSao Paulo State Univ, Fac Engn Guaratingueta, Ave Doutor Ariberto Pereira da Cunha 333, BR-12516410 Guaratingueta, SP, BrazilElsevier B.V.Universidade de São Paulo (USP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Gomes, Fabricio M.Pereira, Felix M.Silva, Aneirson F.Silva, Messias B.2019-10-04T12:14:36Z2019-10-04T12:14:36Z2019-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article21-33http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2019.05.002Knowledge-based Systems. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Bv, v. 179, p. 21-33, 2019.0950-7051http://hdl.handle.net/11449/18455910.1016/j.knosys.2019.05.002WOS:000473839200003Web of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengKnowledge-based Systemsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2025-04-03T15:00:02Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/184559Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462025-04-03T15:00:02Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Multiple response optimization: Analysis of genetic programming for symbolic regression and assessment of desirability functions
title Multiple response optimization: Analysis of genetic programming for symbolic regression and assessment of desirability functions
spellingShingle Multiple response optimization: Analysis of genetic programming for symbolic regression and assessment of desirability functions
Gomes, Fabricio M.
Optimization
Genetic programming
Desirability function
Modeling
title_short Multiple response optimization: Analysis of genetic programming for symbolic regression and assessment of desirability functions
title_full Multiple response optimization: Analysis of genetic programming for symbolic regression and assessment of desirability functions
title_fullStr Multiple response optimization: Analysis of genetic programming for symbolic regression and assessment of desirability functions
title_full_unstemmed Multiple response optimization: Analysis of genetic programming for symbolic regression and assessment of desirability functions
title_sort Multiple response optimization: Analysis of genetic programming for symbolic regression and assessment of desirability functions
author Gomes, Fabricio M.
author_facet Gomes, Fabricio M.
Pereira, Felix M.
Silva, Aneirson F.
Silva, Messias B.
author_role author
author2 Pereira, Felix M.
Silva, Aneirson F.
Silva, Messias B.
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Gomes, Fabricio M.
Pereira, Felix M.
Silva, Aneirson F.
Silva, Messias B.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Optimization
Genetic programming
Desirability function
Modeling
topic Optimization
Genetic programming
Desirability function
Modeling
description Multiple responses optimization (MRO) consists in the search for the best settings in an problem with conflicting responses. MRO is performed following the steps: experimental design; experimental data gathering; mathematical models building; statistical validation of models; agglutination of the models responses in only one function to be optimized; optimization of agglutinated function; experimental validation of the best conditions. This work selected two MRO cases from literature aiming to compare two methods of mathematical models building and two agglutinating functions to assess the best one among the four possible combinations. The methods used in mathematical models building were the ordinary least squares performed in Minitab (v. 17) and genetic programming performed in Eureqa Formulize (v. 1.24.0). The assessment of the best method for building mathematical models was performed using the Akaike Information Criterion. The responses agglutination were performed using the desirability and modified desirability functions. In all MRO cases, the optimization step was performed by generalized reduced gradient method on Microsoft Excel (TM) software. The average percentage distance between predicted and experimental results was used to both assess the best agglutination function and verify the effect of the method used in the building of the mathematical models about its fitness to estimate the best condition close to that one obtained on experimental validation step. The obtained results suggest as the better strategy for multiple responses optimization the use, jointly, of genetic programming to mathematical models building and the modified desirability function to responses agglutination. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-10-04T12:14:36Z
2019-10-04T12:14:36Z
2019-09-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2019.05.002
Knowledge-based Systems. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Bv, v. 179, p. 21-33, 2019.
0950-7051
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/184559
10.1016/j.knosys.2019.05.002
WOS:000473839200003
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2019.05.002
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/184559
identifier_str_mv Knowledge-based Systems. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Bv, v. 179, p. 21-33, 2019.
0950-7051
10.1016/j.knosys.2019.05.002
WOS:000473839200003
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Knowledge-based Systems
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 21-33
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier B.V.
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier B.V.
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Web of Science
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositoriounesp@unesp.br
_version_ 1834482657758543872