Sustainability assessment of FLOCponics compared to stand-alone hydroponic and biofloc systems using emergy synthesis
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Publication Date: | 2022 |
| Other Authors: | , , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | eng |
| Source: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
| Download full: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109092 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/241301 |
Summary: | FLOCponics is an intensive integrated agri-aquaculture system that combines biofloc-based aquaculture with hydroponics. Since research on FLOCponics is in its early stage of development, and many aspects of this system still need to be explored, the objective of this study was to assess and discuss the sustainability of a FLOCponics system and compare it to stand-alone biofloc and hydroponic cultures. This investigation will lead to a novel perspective of what troubling points need to be covered in the FLOCponics research field before they turn into a commercial scale problem. To do this, we conducted an experiment-based study by applying emergy synthesis to assess the sustainability of tilapia juveniles and lettuce production in FLOCponics, biofloc and/or hydroponic systems. The results indicate that the resources from the larger economy were the inputs that made the greatest contribution in all systems. Overall, most of the emergy indicators are similar for all systems, suggesting that FLOCponics, biofloc and hydroponic systems use low amounts of natural renewable resources, cause a moderate environmental load (EIR and ELR of 3.1 to 3.6), and lead to environmental stress seven times higher than the contribution to the economy (ESI of 0.3). Unit emergy values (UEVs) are different for each system, indicating that, under the evaluated conditions, FLOCponics (UEV: 2.54E + 06 sej/J) is more efficient than hydroponics (UEV: 5.55E + 10 sej/J) and less efficient than a biofloc system (UEV: 1.42E + 06 sej/J). Our findings provide valuable insights regarding the (un)sustainable aspects of FLOCponics and direct further research to improve the system's emergy performance. Based on the emergy performance, FLOCponics can be considered a promising sustainable food production approach, mainly considering that it is a system under development and there are still many opportunities for improvement. |
| id |
UNSP_350a0e5f23eecf197fff2925127dc63b |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/241301 |
| network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
| network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
| repository_id_str |
2946 |
| spelling |
Sustainability assessment of FLOCponics compared to stand-alone hydroponic and biofloc systems using emergy synthesisAquacultureEmergyFLOCponicsHydroponicsSustainability indicatorsFLOCponics is an intensive integrated agri-aquaculture system that combines biofloc-based aquaculture with hydroponics. Since research on FLOCponics is in its early stage of development, and many aspects of this system still need to be explored, the objective of this study was to assess and discuss the sustainability of a FLOCponics system and compare it to stand-alone biofloc and hydroponic cultures. This investigation will lead to a novel perspective of what troubling points need to be covered in the FLOCponics research field before they turn into a commercial scale problem. To do this, we conducted an experiment-based study by applying emergy synthesis to assess the sustainability of tilapia juveniles and lettuce production in FLOCponics, biofloc and/or hydroponic systems. The results indicate that the resources from the larger economy were the inputs that made the greatest contribution in all systems. Overall, most of the emergy indicators are similar for all systems, suggesting that FLOCponics, biofloc and hydroponic systems use low amounts of natural renewable resources, cause a moderate environmental load (EIR and ELR of 3.1 to 3.6), and lead to environmental stress seven times higher than the contribution to the economy (ESI of 0.3). Unit emergy values (UEVs) are different for each system, indicating that, under the evaluated conditions, FLOCponics (UEV: 2.54E + 06 sej/J) is more efficient than hydroponics (UEV: 5.55E + 10 sej/J) and less efficient than a biofloc system (UEV: 1.42E + 06 sej/J). Our findings provide valuable insights regarding the (un)sustainable aspects of FLOCponics and direct further research to improve the system's emergy performance. Based on the emergy performance, FLOCponics can be considered a promising sustainable food production approach, mainly considering that it is a system under development and there are still many opportunities for improvement.Mathematical and Statistical Methods (Biometris) Wageningen University, P.O. Box 16São Paulo State University (Unesp) Aquaculture Center of Unesp, SPLeibniz-Institute of Vegetable and Ornamental Crops (IGZ)Fisheries Institute APTA/SAA São José do Rio PretoSão Paulo State University (Unesp) Aquaculture Center of Unesp, SPWageningen UniversityUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Leibniz-Institute of Vegetable and Ornamental Crops (IGZ)São José do Rio PretoPinho, Sara M [UNESP]David, Luiz H. [UNESP]Garcia, Fabiana [UNESP]Portella, Maria Célia [UNESP]Keesman, Karel J.2023-03-01T20:55:55Z2023-03-01T20:55:55Z2022-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109092Ecological Indicators, v. 141.1470-160Xhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/24130110.1016/j.ecolind.2022.1090922-s2.0-85133732582Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengEcological Indicatorsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-04-09T15:43:25Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/241301Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-04-09T15:43:25Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Sustainability assessment of FLOCponics compared to stand-alone hydroponic and biofloc systems using emergy synthesis |
| title |
Sustainability assessment of FLOCponics compared to stand-alone hydroponic and biofloc systems using emergy synthesis |
| spellingShingle |
Sustainability assessment of FLOCponics compared to stand-alone hydroponic and biofloc systems using emergy synthesis Pinho, Sara M [UNESP] Aquaculture Emergy FLOCponics Hydroponics Sustainability indicators |
| title_short |
Sustainability assessment of FLOCponics compared to stand-alone hydroponic and biofloc systems using emergy synthesis |
| title_full |
Sustainability assessment of FLOCponics compared to stand-alone hydroponic and biofloc systems using emergy synthesis |
| title_fullStr |
Sustainability assessment of FLOCponics compared to stand-alone hydroponic and biofloc systems using emergy synthesis |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Sustainability assessment of FLOCponics compared to stand-alone hydroponic and biofloc systems using emergy synthesis |
| title_sort |
Sustainability assessment of FLOCponics compared to stand-alone hydroponic and biofloc systems using emergy synthesis |
| author |
Pinho, Sara M [UNESP] |
| author_facet |
Pinho, Sara M [UNESP] David, Luiz H. [UNESP] Garcia, Fabiana [UNESP] Portella, Maria Célia [UNESP] Keesman, Karel J. |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
David, Luiz H. [UNESP] Garcia, Fabiana [UNESP] Portella, Maria Célia [UNESP] Keesman, Karel J. |
| author2_role |
author author author author |
| dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Wageningen University Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) Leibniz-Institute of Vegetable and Ornamental Crops (IGZ) São José do Rio Preto |
| dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Pinho, Sara M [UNESP] David, Luiz H. [UNESP] Garcia, Fabiana [UNESP] Portella, Maria Célia [UNESP] Keesman, Karel J. |
| dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Aquaculture Emergy FLOCponics Hydroponics Sustainability indicators |
| topic |
Aquaculture Emergy FLOCponics Hydroponics Sustainability indicators |
| description |
FLOCponics is an intensive integrated agri-aquaculture system that combines biofloc-based aquaculture with hydroponics. Since research on FLOCponics is in its early stage of development, and many aspects of this system still need to be explored, the objective of this study was to assess and discuss the sustainability of a FLOCponics system and compare it to stand-alone biofloc and hydroponic cultures. This investigation will lead to a novel perspective of what troubling points need to be covered in the FLOCponics research field before they turn into a commercial scale problem. To do this, we conducted an experiment-based study by applying emergy synthesis to assess the sustainability of tilapia juveniles and lettuce production in FLOCponics, biofloc and/or hydroponic systems. The results indicate that the resources from the larger economy were the inputs that made the greatest contribution in all systems. Overall, most of the emergy indicators are similar for all systems, suggesting that FLOCponics, biofloc and hydroponic systems use low amounts of natural renewable resources, cause a moderate environmental load (EIR and ELR of 3.1 to 3.6), and lead to environmental stress seven times higher than the contribution to the economy (ESI of 0.3). Unit emergy values (UEVs) are different for each system, indicating that, under the evaluated conditions, FLOCponics (UEV: 2.54E + 06 sej/J) is more efficient than hydroponics (UEV: 5.55E + 10 sej/J) and less efficient than a biofloc system (UEV: 1.42E + 06 sej/J). Our findings provide valuable insights regarding the (un)sustainable aspects of FLOCponics and direct further research to improve the system's emergy performance. Based on the emergy performance, FLOCponics can be considered a promising sustainable food production approach, mainly considering that it is a system under development and there are still many opportunities for improvement. |
| publishDate |
2022 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-08-01 2023-03-01T20:55:55Z 2023-03-01T20:55:55Z |
| dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109092 Ecological Indicators, v. 141. 1470-160X http://hdl.handle.net/11449/241301 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109092 2-s2.0-85133732582 |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109092 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/241301 |
| identifier_str_mv |
Ecological Indicators, v. 141. 1470-160X 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109092 2-s2.0-85133732582 |
| dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Ecological Indicators |
| dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
| instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
| instacron_str |
UNESP |
| institution |
UNESP |
| reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
| collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositoriounesp@unesp.br |
| _version_ |
1834483812614012928 |