Sustainability assessment of FLOCponics compared to stand-alone hydroponic and biofloc systems using emergy synthesis

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Pinho, Sara M [UNESP]
Publication Date: 2022
Other Authors: David, Luiz H. [UNESP], Garcia, Fabiana [UNESP], Portella, Maria Célia [UNESP], Keesman, Karel J.
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Download full: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109092
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/241301
Summary: FLOCponics is an intensive integrated agri-aquaculture system that combines biofloc-based aquaculture with hydroponics. Since research on FLOCponics is in its early stage of development, and many aspects of this system still need to be explored, the objective of this study was to assess and discuss the sustainability of a FLOCponics system and compare it to stand-alone biofloc and hydroponic cultures. This investigation will lead to a novel perspective of what troubling points need to be covered in the FLOCponics research field before they turn into a commercial scale problem. To do this, we conducted an experiment-based study by applying emergy synthesis to assess the sustainability of tilapia juveniles and lettuce production in FLOCponics, biofloc and/or hydroponic systems. The results indicate that the resources from the larger economy were the inputs that made the greatest contribution in all systems. Overall, most of the emergy indicators are similar for all systems, suggesting that FLOCponics, biofloc and hydroponic systems use low amounts of natural renewable resources, cause a moderate environmental load (EIR and ELR of 3.1 to 3.6), and lead to environmental stress seven times higher than the contribution to the economy (ESI of 0.3). Unit emergy values (UEVs) are different for each system, indicating that, under the evaluated conditions, FLOCponics (UEV: 2.54E + 06 sej/J) is more efficient than hydroponics (UEV: 5.55E + 10 sej/J) and less efficient than a biofloc system (UEV: 1.42E + 06 sej/J). Our findings provide valuable insights regarding the (un)sustainable aspects of FLOCponics and direct further research to improve the system's emergy performance. Based on the emergy performance, FLOCponics can be considered a promising sustainable food production approach, mainly considering that it is a system under development and there are still many opportunities for improvement.
id UNSP_350a0e5f23eecf197fff2925127dc63b
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/241301
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Sustainability assessment of FLOCponics compared to stand-alone hydroponic and biofloc systems using emergy synthesisAquacultureEmergyFLOCponicsHydroponicsSustainability indicatorsFLOCponics is an intensive integrated agri-aquaculture system that combines biofloc-based aquaculture with hydroponics. Since research on FLOCponics is in its early stage of development, and many aspects of this system still need to be explored, the objective of this study was to assess and discuss the sustainability of a FLOCponics system and compare it to stand-alone biofloc and hydroponic cultures. This investigation will lead to a novel perspective of what troubling points need to be covered in the FLOCponics research field before they turn into a commercial scale problem. To do this, we conducted an experiment-based study by applying emergy synthesis to assess the sustainability of tilapia juveniles and lettuce production in FLOCponics, biofloc and/or hydroponic systems. The results indicate that the resources from the larger economy were the inputs that made the greatest contribution in all systems. Overall, most of the emergy indicators are similar for all systems, suggesting that FLOCponics, biofloc and hydroponic systems use low amounts of natural renewable resources, cause a moderate environmental load (EIR and ELR of 3.1 to 3.6), and lead to environmental stress seven times higher than the contribution to the economy (ESI of 0.3). Unit emergy values (UEVs) are different for each system, indicating that, under the evaluated conditions, FLOCponics (UEV: 2.54E + 06 sej/J) is more efficient than hydroponics (UEV: 5.55E + 10 sej/J) and less efficient than a biofloc system (UEV: 1.42E + 06 sej/J). Our findings provide valuable insights regarding the (un)sustainable aspects of FLOCponics and direct further research to improve the system's emergy performance. Based on the emergy performance, FLOCponics can be considered a promising sustainable food production approach, mainly considering that it is a system under development and there are still many opportunities for improvement.Mathematical and Statistical Methods (Biometris) Wageningen University, P.O. Box 16São Paulo State University (Unesp) Aquaculture Center of Unesp, SPLeibniz-Institute of Vegetable and Ornamental Crops (IGZ)Fisheries Institute APTA/SAA São José do Rio PretoSão Paulo State University (Unesp) Aquaculture Center of Unesp, SPWageningen UniversityUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Leibniz-Institute of Vegetable and Ornamental Crops (IGZ)São José do Rio PretoPinho, Sara M [UNESP]David, Luiz H. [UNESP]Garcia, Fabiana [UNESP]Portella, Maria Célia [UNESP]Keesman, Karel J.2023-03-01T20:55:55Z2023-03-01T20:55:55Z2022-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109092Ecological Indicators, v. 141.1470-160Xhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/24130110.1016/j.ecolind.2022.1090922-s2.0-85133732582Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengEcological Indicatorsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-04-09T15:43:25Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/241301Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-04-09T15:43:25Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Sustainability assessment of FLOCponics compared to stand-alone hydroponic and biofloc systems using emergy synthesis
title Sustainability assessment of FLOCponics compared to stand-alone hydroponic and biofloc systems using emergy synthesis
spellingShingle Sustainability assessment of FLOCponics compared to stand-alone hydroponic and biofloc systems using emergy synthesis
Pinho, Sara M [UNESP]
Aquaculture
Emergy
FLOCponics
Hydroponics
Sustainability indicators
title_short Sustainability assessment of FLOCponics compared to stand-alone hydroponic and biofloc systems using emergy synthesis
title_full Sustainability assessment of FLOCponics compared to stand-alone hydroponic and biofloc systems using emergy synthesis
title_fullStr Sustainability assessment of FLOCponics compared to stand-alone hydroponic and biofloc systems using emergy synthesis
title_full_unstemmed Sustainability assessment of FLOCponics compared to stand-alone hydroponic and biofloc systems using emergy synthesis
title_sort Sustainability assessment of FLOCponics compared to stand-alone hydroponic and biofloc systems using emergy synthesis
author Pinho, Sara M [UNESP]
author_facet Pinho, Sara M [UNESP]
David, Luiz H. [UNESP]
Garcia, Fabiana [UNESP]
Portella, Maria Célia [UNESP]
Keesman, Karel J.
author_role author
author2 David, Luiz H. [UNESP]
Garcia, Fabiana [UNESP]
Portella, Maria Célia [UNESP]
Keesman, Karel J.
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Wageningen University
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
Leibniz-Institute of Vegetable and Ornamental Crops (IGZ)
São José do Rio Preto
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pinho, Sara M [UNESP]
David, Luiz H. [UNESP]
Garcia, Fabiana [UNESP]
Portella, Maria Célia [UNESP]
Keesman, Karel J.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Aquaculture
Emergy
FLOCponics
Hydroponics
Sustainability indicators
topic Aquaculture
Emergy
FLOCponics
Hydroponics
Sustainability indicators
description FLOCponics is an intensive integrated agri-aquaculture system that combines biofloc-based aquaculture with hydroponics. Since research on FLOCponics is in its early stage of development, and many aspects of this system still need to be explored, the objective of this study was to assess and discuss the sustainability of a FLOCponics system and compare it to stand-alone biofloc and hydroponic cultures. This investigation will lead to a novel perspective of what troubling points need to be covered in the FLOCponics research field before they turn into a commercial scale problem. To do this, we conducted an experiment-based study by applying emergy synthesis to assess the sustainability of tilapia juveniles and lettuce production in FLOCponics, biofloc and/or hydroponic systems. The results indicate that the resources from the larger economy were the inputs that made the greatest contribution in all systems. Overall, most of the emergy indicators are similar for all systems, suggesting that FLOCponics, biofloc and hydroponic systems use low amounts of natural renewable resources, cause a moderate environmental load (EIR and ELR of 3.1 to 3.6), and lead to environmental stress seven times higher than the contribution to the economy (ESI of 0.3). Unit emergy values (UEVs) are different for each system, indicating that, under the evaluated conditions, FLOCponics (UEV: 2.54E + 06 sej/J) is more efficient than hydroponics (UEV: 5.55E + 10 sej/J) and less efficient than a biofloc system (UEV: 1.42E + 06 sej/J). Our findings provide valuable insights regarding the (un)sustainable aspects of FLOCponics and direct further research to improve the system's emergy performance. Based on the emergy performance, FLOCponics can be considered a promising sustainable food production approach, mainly considering that it is a system under development and there are still many opportunities for improvement.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-08-01
2023-03-01T20:55:55Z
2023-03-01T20:55:55Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109092
Ecological Indicators, v. 141.
1470-160X
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/241301
10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109092
2-s2.0-85133732582
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109092
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/241301
identifier_str_mv Ecological Indicators, v. 141.
1470-160X
10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109092
2-s2.0-85133732582
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Ecological Indicators
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositoriounesp@unesp.br
_version_ 1834483812614012928