Effect of genetic and sex effect on genomic prediction for horn development in Nellore cattle
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2024 |
Other Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | eng |
Source: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Download full: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2024.105478 https://hdl.handle.net/11449/308940 |
Summary: | This study aimed to evaluate the influence of phenotypic classification of horn development, animal sex effect, and non-autosomal SNP (single nucleotide polymorphism) markers on the genetic parameters and genomic prediction ability for horn development in Nellore cattle using the single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction method. The polled phenotype was evaluated in two (presence and absence of horns), three (scurs and polled offspring from a horned parent, and the polled and horned animals), and four (absence of horn, polled born to a parent with horn, scurs, and presence of horn) phenotypic categories. A total of 12 statistical models were evaluated. The variance components were estimated using the THRGIBBS1F90 software, and a threshold animal model was used for genomic prediction analyses with the single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) procedure. Accuracy, bias, and dispersion parameters were evaluated based on the linear regression (LR) method. The highest heritability (0.84) was obtained when the polled character was evaluated as a binary trait. The lowest heritability estimates (0.44 to 0.45) for horn development were obtained when the phenotype was classified into three categories. For the same horn development classification method, the heritability estimates were similar regardless of the genomic evaluated models and fixed effects included in the model. For models considering four and three phenotypic categories for horn development, the inclusion of the sex effect as a fixed effect within the CG did not improve the accuracy, bias, and dispersion of genomic predictions for horn development. Analyzing the trait with binary expression, the highest prediction accuracy was observed when the effect of sex was not included in the CG and without the SNPs in the sex chromosomes. These models displayed the highest dispersion, pointing out the low robustness of genomic prediction. In addition, models that use less than four categories to classify the horn development phenotype, with no discrimination between polled and homozygous polled displayed lower prediction ability. The inclusion of non-autosomal SNPs in the analyses for the models considering four phenotypic categories leads to an improvement in prediction accuracy in 5,26 %, bias, and dispersion reduction, 37 % and 4,55 %, respectively, compared with models that only considered autosomal SNPs. The selection using genomic information for the polled trait is feasible, and it is an alternative to obtaining polled Nellore animals. The binary coding of horn development is an unsuitable oversimplification of polled phenotype, and probably, the genetic background of horn development is more complex than previously proposed. The most adequate prediction model to evaluate the horn development in Nellore cattle was considering four phenotypic categories and including non-autosomal SNP in the analyses for genomic prediction purposes of naturally genetically polled animals. Genetic dehorning can be adopted on a large scale as a low-cost and non-invasive approach to increase the frequency of hornless animals using genomic information and mating strategies. |
id |
UNSP_1a4963a873f6f2894b90d8257c1f7574 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/308940 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Effect of genetic and sex effect on genomic prediction for horn development in Nellore cattleBos indicusPolledScursSex chromosomesssGBLUPThis study aimed to evaluate the influence of phenotypic classification of horn development, animal sex effect, and non-autosomal SNP (single nucleotide polymorphism) markers on the genetic parameters and genomic prediction ability for horn development in Nellore cattle using the single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction method. The polled phenotype was evaluated in two (presence and absence of horns), three (scurs and polled offspring from a horned parent, and the polled and horned animals), and four (absence of horn, polled born to a parent with horn, scurs, and presence of horn) phenotypic categories. A total of 12 statistical models were evaluated. The variance components were estimated using the THRGIBBS1F90 software, and a threshold animal model was used for genomic prediction analyses with the single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) procedure. Accuracy, bias, and dispersion parameters were evaluated based on the linear regression (LR) method. The highest heritability (0.84) was obtained when the polled character was evaluated as a binary trait. The lowest heritability estimates (0.44 to 0.45) for horn development were obtained when the phenotype was classified into three categories. For the same horn development classification method, the heritability estimates were similar regardless of the genomic evaluated models and fixed effects included in the model. For models considering four and three phenotypic categories for horn development, the inclusion of the sex effect as a fixed effect within the CG did not improve the accuracy, bias, and dispersion of genomic predictions for horn development. Analyzing the trait with binary expression, the highest prediction accuracy was observed when the effect of sex was not included in the CG and without the SNPs in the sex chromosomes. These models displayed the highest dispersion, pointing out the low robustness of genomic prediction. In addition, models that use less than four categories to classify the horn development phenotype, with no discrimination between polled and homozygous polled displayed lower prediction ability. The inclusion of non-autosomal SNPs in the analyses for the models considering four phenotypic categories leads to an improvement in prediction accuracy in 5,26 %, bias, and dispersion reduction, 37 % and 4,55 %, respectively, compared with models that only considered autosomal SNPs. The selection using genomic information for the polled trait is feasible, and it is an alternative to obtaining polled Nellore animals. The binary coding of horn development is an unsuitable oversimplification of polled phenotype, and probably, the genetic background of horn development is more complex than previously proposed. The most adequate prediction model to evaluate the horn development in Nellore cattle was considering four phenotypic categories and including non-autosomal SNP in the analyses for genomic prediction purposes of naturally genetically polled animals. Genetic dehorning can be adopted on a large scale as a low-cost and non-invasive approach to increase the frequency of hornless animals using genomic information and mating strategies.Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Universidade Estadual Paulista, SPEmbrapa Cerrados Planaltina, DFUniversidade Federal de Goiás, GOVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityNational Association of Breeders and Researchers (ANCP)Marca OB Pontes e Lacerda, MTNelore Mocho CV Campina Farm, SPUniversidade Estadual Paulista, SPFAPESP: 2022/12134-0Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (EMBRAPA)Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityNational Association of Breeders and Researchers (ANCP)Pontes e LacerdaCampina FarmTemp, Larissa Bordin [UNESP]Brunes, Ludmilla CostaPereira, Letícia SilvaAmorim, Sabrina ThaiseMagnabosco, Cláudio UlhôaLobo, Raysildo Barbosade Brito, Ovidio CarlosViacava, RicardoBaldi, Fernando [UNESP]2025-04-29T20:14:03Z2024-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2024.105478Livestock Science, v. 284.1871-1413https://hdl.handle.net/11449/30894010.1016/j.livsci.2024.1054782-s2.0-85193798904Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengLivestock Scienceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2025-04-30T13:34:09Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/308940Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462025-04-30T13:34:09Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Effect of genetic and sex effect on genomic prediction for horn development in Nellore cattle |
title |
Effect of genetic and sex effect on genomic prediction for horn development in Nellore cattle |
spellingShingle |
Effect of genetic and sex effect on genomic prediction for horn development in Nellore cattle Temp, Larissa Bordin [UNESP] Bos indicus Polled Scurs Sex chromosomes ssGBLUP |
title_short |
Effect of genetic and sex effect on genomic prediction for horn development in Nellore cattle |
title_full |
Effect of genetic and sex effect on genomic prediction for horn development in Nellore cattle |
title_fullStr |
Effect of genetic and sex effect on genomic prediction for horn development in Nellore cattle |
title_full_unstemmed |
Effect of genetic and sex effect on genomic prediction for horn development in Nellore cattle |
title_sort |
Effect of genetic and sex effect on genomic prediction for horn development in Nellore cattle |
author |
Temp, Larissa Bordin [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Temp, Larissa Bordin [UNESP] Brunes, Ludmilla Costa Pereira, Letícia Silva Amorim, Sabrina Thaise Magnabosco, Cláudio Ulhôa Lobo, Raysildo Barbosa de Brito, Ovidio Carlos Viacava, Ricardo Baldi, Fernando [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Brunes, Ludmilla Costa Pereira, Letícia Silva Amorim, Sabrina Thaise Magnabosco, Cláudio Ulhôa Lobo, Raysildo Barbosa de Brito, Ovidio Carlos Viacava, Ricardo Baldi, Fernando [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (EMBRAPA) Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University National Association of Breeders and Researchers (ANCP) Pontes e Lacerda Campina Farm |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Temp, Larissa Bordin [UNESP] Brunes, Ludmilla Costa Pereira, Letícia Silva Amorim, Sabrina Thaise Magnabosco, Cláudio Ulhôa Lobo, Raysildo Barbosa de Brito, Ovidio Carlos Viacava, Ricardo Baldi, Fernando [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Bos indicus Polled Scurs Sex chromosomes ssGBLUP |
topic |
Bos indicus Polled Scurs Sex chromosomes ssGBLUP |
description |
This study aimed to evaluate the influence of phenotypic classification of horn development, animal sex effect, and non-autosomal SNP (single nucleotide polymorphism) markers on the genetic parameters and genomic prediction ability for horn development in Nellore cattle using the single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction method. The polled phenotype was evaluated in two (presence and absence of horns), three (scurs and polled offspring from a horned parent, and the polled and horned animals), and four (absence of horn, polled born to a parent with horn, scurs, and presence of horn) phenotypic categories. A total of 12 statistical models were evaluated. The variance components were estimated using the THRGIBBS1F90 software, and a threshold animal model was used for genomic prediction analyses with the single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) procedure. Accuracy, bias, and dispersion parameters were evaluated based on the linear regression (LR) method. The highest heritability (0.84) was obtained when the polled character was evaluated as a binary trait. The lowest heritability estimates (0.44 to 0.45) for horn development were obtained when the phenotype was classified into three categories. For the same horn development classification method, the heritability estimates were similar regardless of the genomic evaluated models and fixed effects included in the model. For models considering four and three phenotypic categories for horn development, the inclusion of the sex effect as a fixed effect within the CG did not improve the accuracy, bias, and dispersion of genomic predictions for horn development. Analyzing the trait with binary expression, the highest prediction accuracy was observed when the effect of sex was not included in the CG and without the SNPs in the sex chromosomes. These models displayed the highest dispersion, pointing out the low robustness of genomic prediction. In addition, models that use less than four categories to classify the horn development phenotype, with no discrimination between polled and homozygous polled displayed lower prediction ability. The inclusion of non-autosomal SNPs in the analyses for the models considering four phenotypic categories leads to an improvement in prediction accuracy in 5,26 %, bias, and dispersion reduction, 37 % and 4,55 %, respectively, compared with models that only considered autosomal SNPs. The selection using genomic information for the polled trait is feasible, and it is an alternative to obtaining polled Nellore animals. The binary coding of horn development is an unsuitable oversimplification of polled phenotype, and probably, the genetic background of horn development is more complex than previously proposed. The most adequate prediction model to evaluate the horn development in Nellore cattle was considering four phenotypic categories and including non-autosomal SNP in the analyses for genomic prediction purposes of naturally genetically polled animals. Genetic dehorning can be adopted on a large scale as a low-cost and non-invasive approach to increase the frequency of hornless animals using genomic information and mating strategies. |
publishDate |
2024 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-06-01 2025-04-29T20:14:03Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2024.105478 Livestock Science, v. 284. 1871-1413 https://hdl.handle.net/11449/308940 10.1016/j.livsci.2024.105478 2-s2.0-85193798904 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2024.105478 https://hdl.handle.net/11449/308940 |
identifier_str_mv |
Livestock Science, v. 284. 1871-1413 10.1016/j.livsci.2024.105478 2-s2.0-85193798904 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Livestock Science |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositoriounesp@unesp.br |
_version_ |
1834482962474729472 |