Nasalance during use of pharyngeal and glottal place of production

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Garcia, Ariany Fernanda
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Marino, Viviane Cristina de Castro [UNESP], Pegoraro-Krook, Maria Inês, Guerra, Thais Alves, Lauris, José Roberto Pereira, Dutka, Jeniffer de Cassia Rillo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20142014071
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/130964
Resumo: This study obtained nasalance scores during use of compensatory articulation (CA) and compared nasalance between groups with and without hypernasality and with and without CA. Speech samples were obtained from 43 individuals with and without velopharyngeal dysfunction during repetition of 20 phrases originating 860 audio recordings and their respective nasometric values. After excluding 143 recordings due to low quality, the remaining 717 samples were rated by three speech language pathologists (SLPs), independently, for presence or absence of hypernasality and CA. Nasalance scores for the 553 samples rated with 100% agreement among the SLPs were grouped according to the auditory-perceptual ratings: Group 1 (G1) - included samples without hypernasality and without CA (n=191); Group2 (G2) - included samples with hypernasality and without CA (n=288); Group 3 (G3) - included samples with hypernasality and with pharyngeal fricative (n=33); Group 4 (G4) - included samples with hypernasality and with glottal stop (n=41). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed significant difference nasalance scores which were significantly higher for G2, G3, and G4 (p<0.0001) when compared to G1. The use of pharyngeal fricative (G3), particularly during /f/ (p=0.0018) and /s/ (p=0.0017) productions resulted in nasalance scores significantly higher than scores found for G2. Significantly higher nasalance values where identified during use of pharyngeal fricative.
id UNSP_149a40c42ba59958e07c306c4fa12dd5
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/130964
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Nasalance during use of pharyngeal and glottal place of productionNasalância durante produção de fricativa faríngea e oclusiva glotalSpeechCleft palateSpeech disordersSpeech production measurementSpeech, language and hearing sciencesFalaFissura palatinaDistúrbios da falaMedida da produção da falaFonoaudiologiaThis study obtained nasalance scores during use of compensatory articulation (CA) and compared nasalance between groups with and without hypernasality and with and without CA. Speech samples were obtained from 43 individuals with and without velopharyngeal dysfunction during repetition of 20 phrases originating 860 audio recordings and their respective nasometric values. After excluding 143 recordings due to low quality, the remaining 717 samples were rated by three speech language pathologists (SLPs), independently, for presence or absence of hypernasality and CA. Nasalance scores for the 553 samples rated with 100% agreement among the SLPs were grouped according to the auditory-perceptual ratings: Group 1 (G1) - included samples without hypernasality and without CA (n=191); Group2 (G2) - included samples with hypernasality and without CA (n=288); Group 3 (G3) - included samples with hypernasality and with pharyngeal fricative (n=33); Group 4 (G4) - included samples with hypernasality and with glottal stop (n=41). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed significant difference nasalance scores which were significantly higher for G2, G3, and G4 (p<0.0001) when compared to G1. The use of pharyngeal fricative (G3), particularly during /f/ (p=0.0018) and /s/ (p=0.0017) productions resulted in nasalance scores significantly higher than scores found for G2. Significantly higher nasalance values where identified during use of pharyngeal fricative.Objetivo: Este estudo obteve medidas de nasalância durante a produção de articulação compensatória (AC) e comparou a nasalância entre grupos com e sem hipernasalidade e com e sem AC. Métodos: As amostras de fala foram obtidas a partir de 43 indivíduos com e sem disfunção velofaríngea durante a repetição de 20 frases, originando um total de 860 gravações e respectivos valores nasométricos. Foram excluídas 143 gravações devido à baixa qualidade e as 717 amostras restantes foram avaliadas por três fonoaudiólogas, de forma independente, quanto à presença ou ausência de hipernasalidade e AC. As 553 amostras julgadas com 100% de concordância entre as fonoaudiólogas foram agrupadas de acordo com o julgamento perceptivo-auditivo: Grupo 1 (G1) - amostras sem hipernasalidade e sem AC (n=191); Grupo 2 (G2) - amostras com hipernasalidade e sem AC (n=288); Grupo 3 (G3) - amostras com hipernasalidade e com fricativa faríngea (n=33); Grupo 4 (G4) - amostras com hipernasalidade e com oclusiva glotal (n=41). Resultados: Análise de variância (ANOVA) revelou medidas de nasalância significativamente maiores para G2, G3 e G4 (p<0,0001) quando comparados ao G1. O uso de fricativa faríngea (G3), particularmente durante /f/ (p=0,0018) e /s/ (p=0,0017) resultou em valores de nasalância significativamente maiores que os valores encontrados para G2. Conclusão: Valores de nasalância significativamente mais elevados foram encontrados durante produção de fricativa faríngea.Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)Graduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Orofacial Clefts and Related Anomalies, Hospital for Rehabilitation of Craniofacial Anomalies, Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Bauru, SP, BrasilDepartamento de Fonoaudiologia, Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências (FFC), Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Marília, SP, BrasilGraduate Program in Speech Language Pathology and Audiology, Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru (FOB), Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Bauru, SP, BrasilUniversidade Estadual Paulista, Departamento de Fonoaudiologia, Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências de MaríliaUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Garcia, Ariany FernandaMarino, Viviane Cristina de Castro [UNESP]Pegoraro-Krook, Maria InêsGuerra, Thais AlvesLauris, José Roberto PereiraDutka, Jeniffer de Cassia Rillo2015-12-07T15:30:28Z2015-12-07T15:30:28Z2014info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article395-401application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20142014071Codas, v. 26, n. 5, p. 395-401, 2014.2317-1782http://hdl.handle.net/11449/13096410.1590/2317-1782/20142014071S2317-17822014000500395S2317-17822014000500395.pdf25388073PubMedreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengCodas0,267info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-08-09T17:40:02Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/130964Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-08-09T17:40:02Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Nasalance during use of pharyngeal and glottal place of production
Nasalância durante produção de fricativa faríngea e oclusiva glotal
title Nasalance during use of pharyngeal and glottal place of production
spellingShingle Nasalance during use of pharyngeal and glottal place of production
Garcia, Ariany Fernanda
Speech
Cleft palate
Speech disorders
Speech production measurement
Speech, language and hearing sciences
Fala
Fissura palatina
Distúrbios da fala
Medida da produção da fala
Fonoaudiologia
title_short Nasalance during use of pharyngeal and glottal place of production
title_full Nasalance during use of pharyngeal and glottal place of production
title_fullStr Nasalance during use of pharyngeal and glottal place of production
title_full_unstemmed Nasalance during use of pharyngeal and glottal place of production
title_sort Nasalance during use of pharyngeal and glottal place of production
author Garcia, Ariany Fernanda
author_facet Garcia, Ariany Fernanda
Marino, Viviane Cristina de Castro [UNESP]
Pegoraro-Krook, Maria Inês
Guerra, Thais Alves
Lauris, José Roberto Pereira
Dutka, Jeniffer de Cassia Rillo
author_role author
author2 Marino, Viviane Cristina de Castro [UNESP]
Pegoraro-Krook, Maria Inês
Guerra, Thais Alves
Lauris, José Roberto Pereira
Dutka, Jeniffer de Cassia Rillo
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Garcia, Ariany Fernanda
Marino, Viviane Cristina de Castro [UNESP]
Pegoraro-Krook, Maria Inês
Guerra, Thais Alves
Lauris, José Roberto Pereira
Dutka, Jeniffer de Cassia Rillo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Speech
Cleft palate
Speech disorders
Speech production measurement
Speech, language and hearing sciences
Fala
Fissura palatina
Distúrbios da fala
Medida da produção da fala
Fonoaudiologia
topic Speech
Cleft palate
Speech disorders
Speech production measurement
Speech, language and hearing sciences
Fala
Fissura palatina
Distúrbios da fala
Medida da produção da fala
Fonoaudiologia
description This study obtained nasalance scores during use of compensatory articulation (CA) and compared nasalance between groups with and without hypernasality and with and without CA. Speech samples were obtained from 43 individuals with and without velopharyngeal dysfunction during repetition of 20 phrases originating 860 audio recordings and their respective nasometric values. After excluding 143 recordings due to low quality, the remaining 717 samples were rated by three speech language pathologists (SLPs), independently, for presence or absence of hypernasality and CA. Nasalance scores for the 553 samples rated with 100% agreement among the SLPs were grouped according to the auditory-perceptual ratings: Group 1 (G1) - included samples without hypernasality and without CA (n=191); Group2 (G2) - included samples with hypernasality and without CA (n=288); Group 3 (G3) - included samples with hypernasality and with pharyngeal fricative (n=33); Group 4 (G4) - included samples with hypernasality and with glottal stop (n=41). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed significant difference nasalance scores which were significantly higher for G2, G3, and G4 (p<0.0001) when compared to G1. The use of pharyngeal fricative (G3), particularly during /f/ (p=0.0018) and /s/ (p=0.0017) productions resulted in nasalance scores significantly higher than scores found for G2. Significantly higher nasalance values where identified during use of pharyngeal fricative.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014
2015-12-07T15:30:28Z
2015-12-07T15:30:28Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20142014071
Codas, v. 26, n. 5, p. 395-401, 2014.
2317-1782
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/130964
10.1590/2317-1782/20142014071
S2317-17822014000500395
S2317-17822014000500395.pdf
25388073
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20142014071
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/130964
identifier_str_mv Codas, v. 26, n. 5, p. 395-401, 2014.
2317-1782
10.1590/2317-1782/20142014071
S2317-17822014000500395
S2317-17822014000500395.pdf
25388073
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Codas
0,267
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 395-401
application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv PubMed
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositoriounesp@unesp.br
_version_ 1834483842755330048