Current challenges in molecular diagnostics of insect venom allergy
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2020 |
Other Authors: | , |
Format: | Other |
Language: | eng |
Source: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Download full: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40629-020-00119-5 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/200168 |
Summary: | Background: Advanced component-resolved diagnostics (CRD) in Hymenoptera venom allergy (HVA) has improved the precise description of individual sensitization profiles. However, diagnostic gaps, peptide-based cross-reactivity, early identification of severe reactors and diagnosis of patients with a clear history of sting reactions but negative specific IgE and skin tests, remain challenging. Methods: Systematic literature search in PubMed and critical analysis of recently published studies on insect venom allergy diagnostics. Results and discussion: CRD has increased the sensitivity of IgE testing and improved the discrimination of primary sensitization from irrelevant cross-reactivity, ultimately providing a better rationale for therapeutic decisions. Despite these major advances, there is still room for improvement in routine HVA diagnostics. Peptide based cross-reactivity among homologous allergens from Vespinae and Polistinae venoms as well as still existing diagnostic gaps are particularly challenging. No marker allergens are currently available to differentiate Vespula and Polistes sensitizations. Several strategies including clinical setting of basophil activation test (BAT) for routine diagnostics, venomic analysis for the identification of novel allergens and characterization of the molecular basis of cross-reactivity could be used to address major limitations and unresolved issues in molecular diagnostics of HVA. |
id |
UNSP_05d16b682b946f6adff3695c29af9cde |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/200168 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Current challenges in molecular diagnostics of insect venom allergyAnaphylaxisComponent-resolved diagnosisCross-reactivityHymenopteraIgEMarker allergensBackground: Advanced component-resolved diagnostics (CRD) in Hymenoptera venom allergy (HVA) has improved the precise description of individual sensitization profiles. However, diagnostic gaps, peptide-based cross-reactivity, early identification of severe reactors and diagnosis of patients with a clear history of sting reactions but negative specific IgE and skin tests, remain challenging. Methods: Systematic literature search in PubMed and critical analysis of recently published studies on insect venom allergy diagnostics. Results and discussion: CRD has increased the sensitivity of IgE testing and improved the discrimination of primary sensitization from irrelevant cross-reactivity, ultimately providing a better rationale for therapeutic decisions. Despite these major advances, there is still room for improvement in routine HVA diagnostics. Peptide based cross-reactivity among homologous allergens from Vespinae and Polistinae venoms as well as still existing diagnostic gaps are particularly challenging. No marker allergens are currently available to differentiate Vespula and Polistes sensitizations. Several strategies including clinical setting of basophil activation test (BAT) for routine diagnostics, venomic analysis for the identification of novel allergens and characterization of the molecular basis of cross-reactivity could be used to address major limitations and unresolved issues in molecular diagnostics of HVA.Department of Dermatology and Allergology University Medical Center Gießen (UKGM) Justus-Liebig University GießenCenter for the Study of Social Insects (CEIS)/Department of Biology/Institute of Biosciences of Rio Claro University of Sao Paulo State (UNESP/RC)Center for the Study of Social Insects (CEIS)/Department of Biology/Institute of Biosciences of Rio Claro University of Sao Paulo State (UNESP/RC)Justus-Liebig University GießenUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Perez-Riverol, A. [UNESP]Palma, M. S. [UNESP]Jakob, T.2020-12-12T01:59:26Z2020-12-12T01:59:26Z2020-05-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/other79-91http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40629-020-00119-5Allergo Journal International, v. 29, n. 3, p. 79-91, 2020.2197-0378http://hdl.handle.net/11449/20016810.1007/s40629-020-00119-52-s2.0-85081656707Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengAllergo Journal Internationalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-10-17T18:20:40Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/200168Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-10-17T18:20:40Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Current challenges in molecular diagnostics of insect venom allergy |
title |
Current challenges in molecular diagnostics of insect venom allergy |
spellingShingle |
Current challenges in molecular diagnostics of insect venom allergy Perez-Riverol, A. [UNESP] Anaphylaxis Component-resolved diagnosis Cross-reactivity Hymenoptera IgE Marker allergens |
title_short |
Current challenges in molecular diagnostics of insect venom allergy |
title_full |
Current challenges in molecular diagnostics of insect venom allergy |
title_fullStr |
Current challenges in molecular diagnostics of insect venom allergy |
title_full_unstemmed |
Current challenges in molecular diagnostics of insect venom allergy |
title_sort |
Current challenges in molecular diagnostics of insect venom allergy |
author |
Perez-Riverol, A. [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Perez-Riverol, A. [UNESP] Palma, M. S. [UNESP] Jakob, T. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Palma, M. S. [UNESP] Jakob, T. |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Justus-Liebig University Gießen Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Perez-Riverol, A. [UNESP] Palma, M. S. [UNESP] Jakob, T. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Anaphylaxis Component-resolved diagnosis Cross-reactivity Hymenoptera IgE Marker allergens |
topic |
Anaphylaxis Component-resolved diagnosis Cross-reactivity Hymenoptera IgE Marker allergens |
description |
Background: Advanced component-resolved diagnostics (CRD) in Hymenoptera venom allergy (HVA) has improved the precise description of individual sensitization profiles. However, diagnostic gaps, peptide-based cross-reactivity, early identification of severe reactors and diagnosis of patients with a clear history of sting reactions but negative specific IgE and skin tests, remain challenging. Methods: Systematic literature search in PubMed and critical analysis of recently published studies on insect venom allergy diagnostics. Results and discussion: CRD has increased the sensitivity of IgE testing and improved the discrimination of primary sensitization from irrelevant cross-reactivity, ultimately providing a better rationale for therapeutic decisions. Despite these major advances, there is still room for improvement in routine HVA diagnostics. Peptide based cross-reactivity among homologous allergens from Vespinae and Polistinae venoms as well as still existing diagnostic gaps are particularly challenging. No marker allergens are currently available to differentiate Vespula and Polistes sensitizations. Several strategies including clinical setting of basophil activation test (BAT) for routine diagnostics, venomic analysis for the identification of novel allergens and characterization of the molecular basis of cross-reactivity could be used to address major limitations and unresolved issues in molecular diagnostics of HVA. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-12-12T01:59:26Z 2020-12-12T01:59:26Z 2020-05-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/other |
format |
other |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40629-020-00119-5 Allergo Journal International, v. 29, n. 3, p. 79-91, 2020. 2197-0378 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/200168 10.1007/s40629-020-00119-5 2-s2.0-85081656707 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40629-020-00119-5 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/200168 |
identifier_str_mv |
Allergo Journal International, v. 29, n. 3, p. 79-91, 2020. 2197-0378 10.1007/s40629-020-00119-5 2-s2.0-85081656707 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Allergo Journal International |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
79-91 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositoriounesp@unesp.br |
_version_ |
1834484340882407424 |