Prozone effect in the diagnosis of syphilis using the vdrl method: experience of a reference service in southern Brazil
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2014 |
Other Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | por |
Source: | Revista de Epidemiologia e Controle de Infecção |
DOI: | 10.17058/reci.v4i1.3959 |
Download full: | https://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/epidemiologia/article/view/3959 |
Summary: | Backgound and Objectives: Syphilis is a systemic infectious disease caused by the spirochete Treponema pallidum. VDRL (Venereal Diseases Research Laboratory) test is the most often used laboratory method for syphilis diagnosis. The prozone effect may occur in 1% to 2% of patients, especially at late stages of syphilis and during pregnancy. The objective of this study was to evaluate the frequency of this effect in analyses performed at Laboratório Regional de Santa Cruz do Sul do Laboratório Central do Rio Grande do Sul, from April to May 2013. Methods: A descriptive study was performed, in which 2018 samples were analyzed by the VDRL method and subsequently, low titers (≤ 1:4) were confirmed by the immunoblot method. Results: A total of 68 (3.37%) samples were positive, of which 49 (72.1%) belonging to women and of these, 38 (77.5%) pregnant women. The VDRL method showed no prozone effect. The 32 samples with titers ≤ 1:4 were confirmed by the treponemal method, resulting in 6 false-positive results, of which 4 were observed in pregnant women. Conclusion: Although not prozone effect was observed in this study, it was concluded that the VDRL method results must be evaluated individually, with the possibility of confirmation through the treponemal test. |
id |
UNISC-4_11bee94983131405c6c0ebbe65530a7d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.online.unisc.br:article/3959 |
network_acronym_str |
UNISC-4 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Epidemiologia e Controle de Infecção |
spelling |
Prozone effect in the diagnosis of syphilis using the vdrl method: experience of a reference service in southern BrazilEfeito prozona no diagnóstico de sífilis pelo método VDRL: experiência de um serviço de referência no sul do Brasil.Backgound and Objectives: Syphilis is a systemic infectious disease caused by the spirochete Treponema pallidum. VDRL (Venereal Diseases Research Laboratory) test is the most often used laboratory method for syphilis diagnosis. The prozone effect may occur in 1% to 2% of patients, especially at late stages of syphilis and during pregnancy. The objective of this study was to evaluate the frequency of this effect in analyses performed at Laboratório Regional de Santa Cruz do Sul do Laboratório Central do Rio Grande do Sul, from April to May 2013. Methods: A descriptive study was performed, in which 2018 samples were analyzed by the VDRL method and subsequently, low titers (≤ 1:4) were confirmed by the immunoblot method. Results: A total of 68 (3.37%) samples were positive, of which 49 (72.1%) belonging to women and of these, 38 (77.5%) pregnant women. The VDRL method showed no prozone effect. The 32 samples with titers ≤ 1:4 were confirmed by the treponemal method, resulting in 6 false-positive results, of which 4 were observed in pregnant women. Conclusion: Although not prozone effect was observed in this study, it was concluded that the VDRL method results must be evaluated individually, with the possibility of confirmation through the treponemal test.Justificativa e Objetivos: A sífilis é uma doença infecciosa sistêmica causada pela bactéria espiroqueta Treponema pallidum. Dentre os métodos de diagnóstico laboratorial da sífilis o mais utilizado é o VDRL (Veneral Diseases Research Laboratory). O efeito prozona pode ocorrer em 1% a 2% dos pacientes, especialmente no estágio de sífilis recente e durante a gravidez. O objetivo desta pesquisa foi avaliar a frequência deste efeito em determinações realizadas no Laboratório Regional de Santa Cruz do Sul do Laboratório Central do Rio Grande do Sul, no período de Abril a Maio de 2013. Métodos: Foi realizado um estudo descritivo, onde foram analisadas 2018 amostras pelo método VDRL e posterior confirmação dos títulos baixos (≤ 1:4) pelo método Imunoblot. Resultados: Um total de 68 (3,37%) amostras foram positivas, das quais 49 (72,1%) pertencentes a mulheres e destas, 38 (77,5%) gestantes. A reação de VDRL não apresentou efeito prozona. As 32 amostras que apresentaram titulações ≤ 1:4 foram confirmadas por método treponêmico obtendo-se 6 resultados falsos positivos, dos quais 4 foram verificados em gestantes. Conclusão: Apesar de não ter-se encontrado efeito prozona neste estudo, concluiu-se que os resultados pelo método de VDRL devem ser avaliados individualmente, com a possibilidade de confirmação por um teste treponêmico.Unisc2014-01-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/epidemiologia/article/view/395910.17058/reci.v4i1.3959Revista de Epidemiologia e Controle de Infecção; Vol. 4 No. 1 (2014); 02-06Revista de Epidemiologia e Controle de Infecção; v. 4 n. 1 (2014); 02-062238-3360reponame:Revista de Epidemiologia e Controle de Infecçãoinstname:Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC)instacron:UNISCporhttps://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/epidemiologia/article/view/3959/3377Jung, Danieli LuizaBecker, DanielaRenner, Jane Dagmar Polloinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2019-03-08T17:25:27Zoai:ojs.online.unisc.br:article/3959Revistahttps://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/epidemiologia/indexONGhttp://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/epidemiologia/oai||liapossuelo@unisc.br|| julia.kern@hotmail.com||reci.unisc@gmail.com2238-33602238-3360opendoar:2019-03-08T17:25:27Revista de Epidemiologia e Controle de Infecção - Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Prozone effect in the diagnosis of syphilis using the vdrl method: experience of a reference service in southern Brazil Efeito prozona no diagnóstico de sífilis pelo método VDRL: experiência de um serviço de referência no sul do Brasil. |
title |
Prozone effect in the diagnosis of syphilis using the vdrl method: experience of a reference service in southern Brazil |
spellingShingle |
Prozone effect in the diagnosis of syphilis using the vdrl method: experience of a reference service in southern Brazil Prozone effect in the diagnosis of syphilis using the vdrl method: experience of a reference service in southern Brazil Jung, Danieli Luiza Jung, Danieli Luiza |
title_short |
Prozone effect in the diagnosis of syphilis using the vdrl method: experience of a reference service in southern Brazil |
title_full |
Prozone effect in the diagnosis of syphilis using the vdrl method: experience of a reference service in southern Brazil |
title_fullStr |
Prozone effect in the diagnosis of syphilis using the vdrl method: experience of a reference service in southern Brazil Prozone effect in the diagnosis of syphilis using the vdrl method: experience of a reference service in southern Brazil |
title_full_unstemmed |
Prozone effect in the diagnosis of syphilis using the vdrl method: experience of a reference service in southern Brazil Prozone effect in the diagnosis of syphilis using the vdrl method: experience of a reference service in southern Brazil |
title_sort |
Prozone effect in the diagnosis of syphilis using the vdrl method: experience of a reference service in southern Brazil |
author |
Jung, Danieli Luiza |
author_facet |
Jung, Danieli Luiza Jung, Danieli Luiza Becker, Daniela Renner, Jane Dagmar Pollo Becker, Daniela Renner, Jane Dagmar Pollo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Becker, Daniela Renner, Jane Dagmar Pollo |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Jung, Danieli Luiza Becker, Daniela Renner, Jane Dagmar Pollo |
description |
Backgound and Objectives: Syphilis is a systemic infectious disease caused by the spirochete Treponema pallidum. VDRL (Venereal Diseases Research Laboratory) test is the most often used laboratory method for syphilis diagnosis. The prozone effect may occur in 1% to 2% of patients, especially at late stages of syphilis and during pregnancy. The objective of this study was to evaluate the frequency of this effect in analyses performed at Laboratório Regional de Santa Cruz do Sul do Laboratório Central do Rio Grande do Sul, from April to May 2013. Methods: A descriptive study was performed, in which 2018 samples were analyzed by the VDRL method and subsequently, low titers (≤ 1:4) were confirmed by the immunoblot method. Results: A total of 68 (3.37%) samples were positive, of which 49 (72.1%) belonging to women and of these, 38 (77.5%) pregnant women. The VDRL method showed no prozone effect. The 32 samples with titers ≤ 1:4 were confirmed by the treponemal method, resulting in 6 false-positive results, of which 4 were observed in pregnant women. Conclusion: Although not prozone effect was observed in this study, it was concluded that the VDRL method results must be evaluated individually, with the possibility of confirmation through the treponemal test. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-01-04 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/epidemiologia/article/view/3959 10.17058/reci.v4i1.3959 |
url |
https://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/epidemiologia/article/view/3959 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.17058/reci.v4i1.3959 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/epidemiologia/article/view/3959/3377 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Unisc |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Unisc |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Epidemiologia e Controle de Infecção; Vol. 4 No. 1 (2014); 02-06 Revista de Epidemiologia e Controle de Infecção; v. 4 n. 1 (2014); 02-06 2238-3360 reponame:Revista de Epidemiologia e Controle de Infecção instname:Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC) instacron:UNISC |
instname_str |
Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC) |
instacron_str |
UNISC |
institution |
UNISC |
reponame_str |
Revista de Epidemiologia e Controle de Infecção |
collection |
Revista de Epidemiologia e Controle de Infecção |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Epidemiologia e Controle de Infecção - Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||liapossuelo@unisc.br|| julia.kern@hotmail.com||reci.unisc@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1822179175604158464 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.17058/reci.v4i1.3959 |