Prozone effect in the diagnosis of syphilis using the vdrl method: experience of a reference service in southern Brazil

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jung, Danieli Luiza
Publication Date: 2014
Other Authors: Becker, Daniela, Renner, Jane Dagmar Pollo
Format: Article
Language: por
Source: Revista de Epidemiologia e Controle de Infecção
DOI: 10.17058/reci.v4i1.3959
Download full: https://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/epidemiologia/article/view/3959
Summary: Backgound and Objectives: Syphilis is a systemic infectious disease caused by the spirochete Treponema pallidum. VDRL (Venereal Diseases Research Laboratory) test is the most often used laboratory method for syphilis diagnosis. The prozone effect may occur in 1% to 2% of patients, especially at late stages of syphilis and during pregnancy. The objective of this study was to evaluate the frequency of this effect in analyses performed at Laboratório Regional de Santa Cruz do Sul do Laboratório Central do Rio Grande do Sul, from April to May 2013. Methods: A descriptive study was performed, in which 2018 samples were analyzed by the VDRL method and subsequently, low titers (≤ 1:4) were confirmed by the immunoblot method. Results: A total of 68 (3.37%) samples were positive, of which 49 (72.1%) belonging to women and of these, 38 (77.5%) pregnant women. The VDRL method showed no prozone effect. The 32 samples with titers ≤ 1:4 were confirmed by the treponemal method, resulting in 6 false-positive results, of which 4 were observed in pregnant women. Conclusion: Although not prozone effect was observed in this study, it was concluded that the VDRL method results must be evaluated individually, with the possibility of confirmation through the treponemal test.
id UNISC-4_11bee94983131405c6c0ebbe65530a7d
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.online.unisc.br:article/3959
network_acronym_str UNISC-4
network_name_str Revista de Epidemiologia e Controle de Infecção
spelling Prozone effect in the diagnosis of syphilis using the vdrl method: experience of a reference service in southern BrazilEfeito prozona no diagnóstico de sífilis pelo método VDRL: experiência de um serviço de referência no sul do Brasil.Backgound and Objectives: Syphilis is a systemic infectious disease caused by the spirochete Treponema pallidum. VDRL (Venereal Diseases Research Laboratory) test is the most often used laboratory method for syphilis diagnosis. The prozone effect may occur in 1% to 2% of patients, especially at late stages of syphilis and during pregnancy. The objective of this study was to evaluate the frequency of this effect in analyses performed at Laboratório Regional de Santa Cruz do Sul do Laboratório Central do Rio Grande do Sul, from April to May 2013. Methods: A descriptive study was performed, in which 2018 samples were analyzed by the VDRL method and subsequently, low titers (≤ 1:4) were confirmed by the immunoblot method. Results: A total of 68 (3.37%) samples were positive, of which 49 (72.1%) belonging to women and of these, 38 (77.5%) pregnant women. The VDRL method showed no prozone effect. The 32 samples with titers ≤ 1:4 were confirmed by the treponemal method, resulting in 6 false-positive results, of which 4 were observed in pregnant women. Conclusion: Although not prozone effect was observed in this study, it was concluded that the VDRL method results must be evaluated individually, with the possibility of confirmation through the treponemal test.Justificativa e Objetivos: A sífilis é uma doença infecciosa sistêmica causada pela bactéria espiroqueta Treponema pallidum. Dentre os métodos de diagnóstico laboratorial da sífilis o mais utilizado é o VDRL (Veneral Diseases Research Laboratory). O efeito prozona pode ocorrer em 1% a 2% dos pacientes, especialmente no estágio de sífilis recente e durante a gravidez. O objetivo desta pesquisa foi avaliar a frequência deste efeito em determinações realizadas no Laboratório Regional de Santa Cruz do Sul do Laboratório Central do Rio Grande do Sul, no período de Abril a Maio de 2013. Métodos: Foi realizado um estudo descritivo, onde foram analisadas 2018 amostras pelo método VDRL e posterior confirmação dos títulos baixos (≤ 1:4) pelo método Imunoblot. Resultados: Um total de 68 (3,37%) amostras foram positivas, das quais 49 (72,1%) pertencentes a mulheres e destas, 38 (77,5%) gestantes. A reação de VDRL não apresentou efeito prozona. As 32 amostras que apresentaram titulações ≤ 1:4 foram confirmadas por método treponêmico obtendo-se 6 resultados falsos positivos, dos quais 4 foram verificados em gestantes. Conclusão: Apesar de não ter-se encontrado efeito prozona neste estudo, concluiu-se que os resultados pelo método de VDRL devem ser avaliados individualmente, com a possibilidade de confirmação por um teste treponêmico.Unisc2014-01-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/epidemiologia/article/view/395910.17058/reci.v4i1.3959Revista de Epidemiologia e Controle de Infecção; Vol. 4 No. 1 (2014); 02-06Revista de Epidemiologia e Controle de Infecção; v. 4 n. 1 (2014); 02-062238-3360reponame:Revista de Epidemiologia e Controle de Infecçãoinstname:Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC)instacron:UNISCporhttps://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/epidemiologia/article/view/3959/3377Jung, Danieli LuizaBecker, DanielaRenner, Jane Dagmar Polloinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2019-03-08T17:25:27Zoai:ojs.online.unisc.br:article/3959Revistahttps://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/epidemiologia/indexONGhttp://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/epidemiologia/oai||liapossuelo@unisc.br|| julia.kern@hotmail.com||reci.unisc@gmail.com2238-33602238-3360opendoar:2019-03-08T17:25:27Revista de Epidemiologia e Controle de Infecção - Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Prozone effect in the diagnosis of syphilis using the vdrl method: experience of a reference service in southern Brazil
Efeito prozona no diagnóstico de sífilis pelo método VDRL: experiência de um serviço de referência no sul do Brasil.
title Prozone effect in the diagnosis of syphilis using the vdrl method: experience of a reference service in southern Brazil
spellingShingle Prozone effect in the diagnosis of syphilis using the vdrl method: experience of a reference service in southern Brazil
Prozone effect in the diagnosis of syphilis using the vdrl method: experience of a reference service in southern Brazil
Jung, Danieli Luiza
Jung, Danieli Luiza
title_short Prozone effect in the diagnosis of syphilis using the vdrl method: experience of a reference service in southern Brazil
title_full Prozone effect in the diagnosis of syphilis using the vdrl method: experience of a reference service in southern Brazil
title_fullStr Prozone effect in the diagnosis of syphilis using the vdrl method: experience of a reference service in southern Brazil
Prozone effect in the diagnosis of syphilis using the vdrl method: experience of a reference service in southern Brazil
title_full_unstemmed Prozone effect in the diagnosis of syphilis using the vdrl method: experience of a reference service in southern Brazil
Prozone effect in the diagnosis of syphilis using the vdrl method: experience of a reference service in southern Brazil
title_sort Prozone effect in the diagnosis of syphilis using the vdrl method: experience of a reference service in southern Brazil
author Jung, Danieli Luiza
author_facet Jung, Danieli Luiza
Jung, Danieli Luiza
Becker, Daniela
Renner, Jane Dagmar Pollo
Becker, Daniela
Renner, Jane Dagmar Pollo
author_role author
author2 Becker, Daniela
Renner, Jane Dagmar Pollo
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Jung, Danieli Luiza
Becker, Daniela
Renner, Jane Dagmar Pollo
description Backgound and Objectives: Syphilis is a systemic infectious disease caused by the spirochete Treponema pallidum. VDRL (Venereal Diseases Research Laboratory) test is the most often used laboratory method for syphilis diagnosis. The prozone effect may occur in 1% to 2% of patients, especially at late stages of syphilis and during pregnancy. The objective of this study was to evaluate the frequency of this effect in analyses performed at Laboratório Regional de Santa Cruz do Sul do Laboratório Central do Rio Grande do Sul, from April to May 2013. Methods: A descriptive study was performed, in which 2018 samples were analyzed by the VDRL method and subsequently, low titers (≤ 1:4) were confirmed by the immunoblot method. Results: A total of 68 (3.37%) samples were positive, of which 49 (72.1%) belonging to women and of these, 38 (77.5%) pregnant women. The VDRL method showed no prozone effect. The 32 samples with titers ≤ 1:4 were confirmed by the treponemal method, resulting in 6 false-positive results, of which 4 were observed in pregnant women. Conclusion: Although not prozone effect was observed in this study, it was concluded that the VDRL method results must be evaluated individually, with the possibility of confirmation through the treponemal test.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-01-04
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/epidemiologia/article/view/3959
10.17058/reci.v4i1.3959
url https://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/epidemiologia/article/view/3959
identifier_str_mv 10.17058/reci.v4i1.3959
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/epidemiologia/article/view/3959/3377
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Unisc
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Unisc
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Epidemiologia e Controle de Infecção; Vol. 4 No. 1 (2014); 02-06
Revista de Epidemiologia e Controle de Infecção; v. 4 n. 1 (2014); 02-06
2238-3360
reponame:Revista de Epidemiologia e Controle de Infecção
instname:Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC)
instacron:UNISC
instname_str Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC)
instacron_str UNISC
institution UNISC
reponame_str Revista de Epidemiologia e Controle de Infecção
collection Revista de Epidemiologia e Controle de Infecção
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Epidemiologia e Controle de Infecção - Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||liapossuelo@unisc.br|| julia.kern@hotmail.com||reci.unisc@gmail.com
_version_ 1822179175604158464
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.17058/reci.v4i1.3959