An analysis of the Doctrine of Fascism and its contribution to understanding Mussolini's movement

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Schargel, Sergio
Publication Date: 2023
Format: Article
Language: por
Source: Argumentos (Montes Claros. Online)
Download full: https://www.periodicos.unimontes.br/index.php/argumentos/article/view/6126
Summary: Of the many discursive materials created by Mussolini in the Fascist vintenium, few are as rich as the 1932 Doctrine. Published at a time when the regime was seeking to institutionalize and “normalize”, the material is fundamental to the historiography of Fascism for revealing how Mussolini saw his own movement/ideology/regime. This article will offer a content analysis of this material, with the intention of apprehending the main elements that constitute it and their differences or similarities in relation to other moments of Fascism. With the help of Robert Paxton's theory, it will be possible to contribute to the historiography of Fascism, by illuminating the idiosyncrasies of the Doctrine, showing how much the movement/regime has changed over the years ― which makes it difficult to speak in a Fascism with frozen features. In short, to understand what Fascism said about itself, and how much this dialogued with Mussolini’s practice.
id UNIMONTES2_371c5763d67e5d144dbdece64da749e8
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs2.periodicos.unimontes.br:article/6126
network_acronym_str UNIMONTES2
network_name_str Argumentos (Montes Claros. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling An analysis of the Doctrine of Fascism and its contribution to understanding Mussolini's movementUn análisis de la Doctrina del fascismo y su contribución a la comprensión del movimiento de MussoliniUma análise sobre a Doutrina do Fascismo e sua contribuição para compreender o movimento de MussoliniBenito MussoliniFascismoDoutrina do Fascismovintêniociclo ditatorial do FascismoOf the many discursive materials created by Mussolini in the Fascist vintenium, few are as rich as the 1932 Doctrine. Published at a time when the regime was seeking to institutionalize and “normalize”, the material is fundamental to the historiography of Fascism for revealing how Mussolini saw his own movement/ideology/regime. This article will offer a content analysis of this material, with the intention of apprehending the main elements that constitute it and their differences or similarities in relation to other moments of Fascism. With the help of Robert Paxton's theory, it will be possible to contribute to the historiography of Fascism, by illuminating the idiosyncrasies of the Doctrine, showing how much the movement/regime has changed over the years ― which makes it difficult to speak in a Fascism with frozen features. In short, to understand what Fascism said about itself, and how much this dialogued with Mussolini’s practice.De los diversos materiales discursivos creados por Mussolini en los veinte años del fascismo, pocos son tan ricos como la Doctrina de 1932. Publicado en un momento en que el régimen buscaba institucionalizar y “normalizar”, el material es fundamental para la historiografía del fascismo por revelar cómo Mussolini vio su propio movimiento/ideología/régimen. Este artículo ofrecerá un análisis de contenido de este material, con la intención de aprehender los principales elementos que lo constituyen y sus diferencias o similitudes en relación con otros momentos del fascismo. Con la ayuda de las teorías de Albert Hirschman y Robert Paxton, será posible contribuir a la historiografía del fascismo, iluminando la idiosincrasia de la Doctrina, mostrando, en la práctica, cuánto ha cambiado el movimiento/régimen a lo largo de los años. Lo que dificulta, en la práctica, hablar de un fascismo hermético. Así, entender lo que el fascismo decía de sí mismo y cuánto dialogaba con la práctica.Dos vários materiais discursivos criados por Mussolini no vintênio Fascista, poucos são tão ricos quanto a Doutrina de 1932. Publicada em um momento em que o regime procurava se institucionalizar e “normalizar”, o material é fundamental à historiografia do Fascismo por revelar como Mussolini enxergava o seu próprio movimento/ideologia/regime. Este artigo oferecerá uma análise de conteúdo deste material, na intenção de apreender os principais elementos que o constituem e suas diferenças ou semelhanças em relação a outros momentos do Fascismo. Com a ajuda das teorias de Albert Hirschman e Robert Paxton, será possível contribuir à historiografia sobre o Fascismo, ao iluminar as idiossincrasias da Doutrina, mostrando, na prática, o quanto o movimento/regime se alterou conforme os anos ― o que dificulta, na prática, falar em um Fascismo com características congeladas. Em suma, entender o que o Fascismo dizia sobre si, e o quanto isso dialogava com a prática.Editora Unimontes2023-11-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://www.periodicos.unimontes.br/index.php/argumentos/article/view/612610.46551/issn.2527-2551v20n2p.210-233Argumentos - Revista do Departamento de Ciências Sociais da Unimontes; v. 20 n. 2 (2023); 209-2332527-25511806-5627reponame:Argumentos (Montes Claros. Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Montes Claros (UNIMONTES)instacron:UNIMONTESporhttps://www.periodicos.unimontes.br/index.php/argumentos/article/view/6126/6888Copyright (c) 2023 Argumentos - Revista do Departamento de Ciências Sociais da Unimontesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSchargel, Sergio2023-11-13T12:01:00Zoai:ojs2.periodicos.unimontes.br:article/6126Revistahttps://www.periodicos.unimontes.br/index.php/argumentosPUBhttps://www.periodicos.unimontes.br/index.php/argumentos/oairevista.argumentos@unimontes.br|| portal.periodicos@unimontes.br||2527-25511806-5627opendoar:2023-11-13T12:01Argumentos (Montes Claros. Online) - Universidade Estadual de Montes Claros (UNIMONTES)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv An analysis of the Doctrine of Fascism and its contribution to understanding Mussolini's movement
Un análisis de la Doctrina del fascismo y su contribución a la comprensión del movimiento de Mussolini
Uma análise sobre a Doutrina do Fascismo e sua contribuição para compreender o movimento de Mussolini
title An analysis of the Doctrine of Fascism and its contribution to understanding Mussolini's movement
spellingShingle An analysis of the Doctrine of Fascism and its contribution to understanding Mussolini's movement
Schargel, Sergio
Benito Mussolini
Fascismo
Doutrina do Fascismo
vintênio
ciclo ditatorial do Fascismo
title_short An analysis of the Doctrine of Fascism and its contribution to understanding Mussolini's movement
title_full An analysis of the Doctrine of Fascism and its contribution to understanding Mussolini's movement
title_fullStr An analysis of the Doctrine of Fascism and its contribution to understanding Mussolini's movement
title_full_unstemmed An analysis of the Doctrine of Fascism and its contribution to understanding Mussolini's movement
title_sort An analysis of the Doctrine of Fascism and its contribution to understanding Mussolini's movement
author Schargel, Sergio
author_facet Schargel, Sergio
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Schargel, Sergio
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Benito Mussolini
Fascismo
Doutrina do Fascismo
vintênio
ciclo ditatorial do Fascismo
topic Benito Mussolini
Fascismo
Doutrina do Fascismo
vintênio
ciclo ditatorial do Fascismo
description Of the many discursive materials created by Mussolini in the Fascist vintenium, few are as rich as the 1932 Doctrine. Published at a time when the regime was seeking to institutionalize and “normalize”, the material is fundamental to the historiography of Fascism for revealing how Mussolini saw his own movement/ideology/regime. This article will offer a content analysis of this material, with the intention of apprehending the main elements that constitute it and their differences or similarities in relation to other moments of Fascism. With the help of Robert Paxton's theory, it will be possible to contribute to the historiography of Fascism, by illuminating the idiosyncrasies of the Doctrine, showing how much the movement/regime has changed over the years ― which makes it difficult to speak in a Fascism with frozen features. In short, to understand what Fascism said about itself, and how much this dialogued with Mussolini’s practice.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-11-08
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.periodicos.unimontes.br/index.php/argumentos/article/view/6126
10.46551/issn.2527-2551v20n2p.210-233
url https://www.periodicos.unimontes.br/index.php/argumentos/article/view/6126
identifier_str_mv 10.46551/issn.2527-2551v20n2p.210-233
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.periodicos.unimontes.br/index.php/argumentos/article/view/6126/6888
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Argumentos - Revista do Departamento de Ciências Sociais da Unimontes
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Argumentos - Revista do Departamento de Ciências Sociais da Unimontes
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora Unimontes
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora Unimontes
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Argumentos - Revista do Departamento de Ciências Sociais da Unimontes; v. 20 n. 2 (2023); 209-233
2527-2551
1806-5627
reponame:Argumentos (Montes Claros. Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Montes Claros (UNIMONTES)
instacron:UNIMONTES
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Montes Claros (UNIMONTES)
instacron_str UNIMONTES
institution UNIMONTES
reponame_str Argumentos (Montes Claros. Online)
collection Argumentos (Montes Claros. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Argumentos (Montes Claros. Online) - Universidade Estadual de Montes Claros (UNIMONTES)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista.argumentos@unimontes.br|| portal.periodicos@unimontes.br||
_version_ 1831661905552343040