The Influence of General Exceptions on the Interpretation of National Treatment in International Investment Law
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Publication Date: | 2017 |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | eng |
| Source: | Revista de Direito Internacional |
| Download full: | https://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/rdi/article/view/4670 |
Summary: | Recent International Investment Agreements have incorporated General Exceptions similar to GATT Article XX in order to balance the respect of National Treatment and protection of States’ right to regulate. The purpose of this piece is to determine if these exceptions are a suitable choice in order to achieve this objective or if another option would be preferable. We first established that General Exceptions are operative exceptions and not interpretative statements. This allowed to assess their effect on the interpretation of national treatment and we managed to prove their potentially detrimental effect on the right to regulate. Then, we searched for other means to interpret National Treatment compatible with general exceptions but none appears to be really effective in achieving the purpose to balance protection of investments and State’s right to regulate. As a consequence, a final study for other treaty wording achieving the stated objective allows to conclude that the most suitable choice would be to codify selected arbitral award allowing to take into account public policy objectives to determine if two investors are in same circumstances, therefore securing the contemplated balance. |
| id |
UNICEUB-5_2d12f9faaa11ef26f04ef7a1d4fb0a7f |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:oai.uniceub.emnuvens.com.br:article/4670 |
| network_acronym_str |
UNICEUB-5 |
| network_name_str |
Revista de Direito Internacional |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
The Influence of General Exceptions on the Interpretation of National Treatment in International Investment LawInternational law, International investment lawInternational investment law, International Investment Agreements, International Trade law, General exceptions, National treatment, Right to regulateRecent International Investment Agreements have incorporated General Exceptions similar to GATT Article XX in order to balance the respect of National Treatment and protection of States’ right to regulate. The purpose of this piece is to determine if these exceptions are a suitable choice in order to achieve this objective or if another option would be preferable. We first established that General Exceptions are operative exceptions and not interpretative statements. This allowed to assess their effect on the interpretation of national treatment and we managed to prove their potentially detrimental effect on the right to regulate. Then, we searched for other means to interpret National Treatment compatible with general exceptions but none appears to be really effective in achieving the purpose to balance protection of investments and State’s right to regulate. As a consequence, a final study for other treaty wording achieving the stated objective allows to conclude that the most suitable choice would be to codify selected arbitral award allowing to take into account public policy objectives to determine if two investors are in same circumstances, therefore securing the contemplated balance.CEUBUniversité de Rennes 1University of OttawaNnaemeka AnozieLouis-Marie, Chauvel2017-10-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/rdi/article/view/467010.5102/rdi.v14i2.4670Revista de Direito Internacional; v. 14, n. 2 (2017): Direito Internacional dos Investimentos / International Investment Law2237-10362236-997Xreponame:Revista de Direito Internacionalinstname:Centro de Ensino de Brasília (UNICEUB)instacron:UNICEUBenghttps://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/rdi/article/view/4670/pdfDireitos autorais 2017 Revista de Direito Internacional (Brazilian Journal of International Law)info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2018-10-08T12:29:33Zoai:oai.uniceub.emnuvens.com.br:article/4670Revistahttps://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/rdiPRIhttps://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/rdi/oainitish.monebhurrun@gmail.com || atendimento.seer@uniceub.br2236-997X2237-1036opendoar:2018-10-08T12:29:33Revista de Direito Internacional - Centro de Ensino de Brasília (UNICEUB)false |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The Influence of General Exceptions on the Interpretation of National Treatment in International Investment Law |
| title |
The Influence of General Exceptions on the Interpretation of National Treatment in International Investment Law |
| spellingShingle |
The Influence of General Exceptions on the Interpretation of National Treatment in International Investment Law Louis-Marie, Chauvel International law, International investment law International investment law, International Investment Agreements, International Trade law, General exceptions, National treatment, Right to regulate |
| title_short |
The Influence of General Exceptions on the Interpretation of National Treatment in International Investment Law |
| title_full |
The Influence of General Exceptions on the Interpretation of National Treatment in International Investment Law |
| title_fullStr |
The Influence of General Exceptions on the Interpretation of National Treatment in International Investment Law |
| title_full_unstemmed |
The Influence of General Exceptions on the Interpretation of National Treatment in International Investment Law |
| title_sort |
The Influence of General Exceptions on the Interpretation of National Treatment in International Investment Law |
| author |
Louis-Marie, Chauvel |
| author_facet |
Louis-Marie, Chauvel |
| author_role |
author |
| dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Université de Rennes 1 University of Ottawa Nnaemeka Anozie |
| dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Louis-Marie, Chauvel |
| dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
International law, International investment law International investment law, International Investment Agreements, International Trade law, General exceptions, National treatment, Right to regulate |
| topic |
International law, International investment law International investment law, International Investment Agreements, International Trade law, General exceptions, National treatment, Right to regulate |
| description |
Recent International Investment Agreements have incorporated General Exceptions similar to GATT Article XX in order to balance the respect of National Treatment and protection of States’ right to regulate. The purpose of this piece is to determine if these exceptions are a suitable choice in order to achieve this objective or if another option would be preferable. We first established that General Exceptions are operative exceptions and not interpretative statements. This allowed to assess their effect on the interpretation of national treatment and we managed to prove their potentially detrimental effect on the right to regulate. Then, we searched for other means to interpret National Treatment compatible with general exceptions but none appears to be really effective in achieving the purpose to balance protection of investments and State’s right to regulate. As a consequence, a final study for other treaty wording achieving the stated objective allows to conclude that the most suitable choice would be to codify selected arbitral award allowing to take into account public policy objectives to determine if two investors are in same circumstances, therefore securing the contemplated balance. |
| publishDate |
2017 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-10-31 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
|
| dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/rdi/article/view/4670 10.5102/rdi.v14i2.4670 |
| url |
https://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/rdi/article/view/4670 |
| identifier_str_mv |
10.5102/rdi.v14i2.4670 |
| dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/rdi/article/view/4670/pdf |
| dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2017 Revista de Direito Internacional (Brazilian Journal of International Law) info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2017 Revista de Direito Internacional (Brazilian Journal of International Law) |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
CEUB |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
CEUB |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Direito Internacional; v. 14, n. 2 (2017): Direito Internacional dos Investimentos / International Investment Law 2237-1036 2236-997X reponame:Revista de Direito Internacional instname:Centro de Ensino de Brasília (UNICEUB) instacron:UNICEUB |
| instname_str |
Centro de Ensino de Brasília (UNICEUB) |
| instacron_str |
UNICEUB |
| institution |
UNICEUB |
| reponame_str |
Revista de Direito Internacional |
| collection |
Revista de Direito Internacional |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Direito Internacional - Centro de Ensino de Brasília (UNICEUB) |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
nitish.monebhurrun@gmail.com || atendimento.seer@uniceub.br |
| _version_ |
1832111422694227968 |