Angioplastia de resgate no infarto agudo do miocárdio

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Moraes, Eraldo Ribeiro Ferreira Leão de [UNIFESP]
Publication Date: 2007
Other Authors: Carvalho, Antonio Carlos [UNIFESP]
Format: Article
Language: por
Source: Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
Download full: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S2179-83972007000400015
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/3472
Summary: BACKGROUND: Acute myocardial infarction is a serious and frequent illness, and its treatment with thrombolytic therapy or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is well established. Rescue PCI is an alternative when thrombolysis fails. In the last ten years several clinical studies have tested different features about this procedure. METHODS: Eighty four studies about rescue angioplasty published in the major cardiovascular relevance literary sources were analyzed between 1997 to 2007. RESULTS: Rescue PCI was superior to conservative treatment, such as rethrombolysis, when well indicated, and seemed similar to primary PCI, in some features. The concomitant use of GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors seemed to show clinical benefits. The use of drug-eluting stents and the association with mechanic thrombectomy still requires better scientific support. The latest metaanalysis about this topic have shown clear favorable results to rescue angioplasty according to clinical outcomes, heart failure and re-infarction, but not so definite results as to mortality. On the other hand, there was a trend of increased stroke risk, of the same magnitude as benefit. CONCLUSION: Rescue PCI has better results than conservative treatment or repeat fibrinolysis. However, the indication of the procedure still needs more precise selection criteria as well as better definition of the clinical benefit/safety ratio. These uncertainties persist due to the small number of rescue angioplasty procedures compared to the total number of angioplasties performed. In the CENIC Registry, rescue angioplasty amounts to 4% of all angioplasties performed.
id UFSP_e10a4224f6f1630c8b2e46e463fbb28e
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/3472
network_acronym_str UFSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository_id_str 3465
spelling Angioplastia de resgate no infarto agudo do miocárdioRescue angioplasty in acute myocardial infarctionMyocardial infarctionAngioplastyThrombolytic therapyInfarto do miocárdioAngioplastiaTerapia trombolíticaBACKGROUND: Acute myocardial infarction is a serious and frequent illness, and its treatment with thrombolytic therapy or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is well established. Rescue PCI is an alternative when thrombolysis fails. In the last ten years several clinical studies have tested different features about this procedure. METHODS: Eighty four studies about rescue angioplasty published in the major cardiovascular relevance literary sources were analyzed between 1997 to 2007. RESULTS: Rescue PCI was superior to conservative treatment, such as rethrombolysis, when well indicated, and seemed similar to primary PCI, in some features. The concomitant use of GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors seemed to show clinical benefits. The use of drug-eluting stents and the association with mechanic thrombectomy still requires better scientific support. The latest metaanalysis about this topic have shown clear favorable results to rescue angioplasty according to clinical outcomes, heart failure and re-infarction, but not so definite results as to mortality. On the other hand, there was a trend of increased stroke risk, of the same magnitude as benefit. CONCLUSION: Rescue PCI has better results than conservative treatment or repeat fibrinolysis. However, the indication of the procedure still needs more precise selection criteria as well as better definition of the clinical benefit/safety ratio. These uncertainties persist due to the small number of rescue angioplasty procedures compared to the total number of angioplasties performed. In the CENIC Registry, rescue angioplasty amounts to 4% of all angioplasties performed.INTRODUÇÃO: O infarto agudo do miocárdio é uma doença grave e freqüente, e seu tratamento com trombólise química ou por angioplastia transluminal coronariana (ATC) está bem estabelecido. A ATC de resgate é uma opção, caso a trombólise seja malsucedida. Nos últimos dez anos, diversos estudos clínicos testaram essa alternativa sob vários aspectos. MÉTODO: Foram analisados 84 estudos sobre angioplastia de resgate publicados nas fontes literárias de maior relevância no âmbito da medicina cardiovascular, entre 1997 e 2007. RESULTADOS: A ATC de resgate foi superior ao tratamento conservador e à retrombólise, quando bem indicada, e semelhante à ATC primária, em muitos aspectos avaliados. O uso concomitante de inibidores da glicoproteína IIb/IIIa parece ter benefícios clínicos. O uso de stents farmacológicos e a associação com trombectomia mecânica são práticas que ainda requerem maior sustentação científica. As últimas metanálises demonstraram resultados favoráveis à ATC de resgate, segundo os desfechos clínicos de eficácia e segurança, sobretudo em relação a insuficiência cardíaca congestiva e reinfarto, mas não quanto à mortalidade. Em contrapartida, houve tendência de aumento do risco de acidente vascular cerebral, de proporção semelhante à do benefício. CONCLUSÕES: A técnica de ATC de resgate demonstrou melhores resultados que o tratamento conservador ou a retrombólise. No entanto, a indicação do procedimento ainda necessita de melhor padronização dos critérios de seleção dos candidatos, além de melhor definição da relação benefícios clínicos/segurança. Essas incertezas persistem pelo fato de as casuísticas de ATC de resgate serem pequenas em relação ao total de ATC realizadas. No registro CENIC, ATC de res-gate corresponde a 4% do total de ATC efetuadas.Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) Departamento de MedicinaUNIFESP, Depto. de MedicinaSciELOSociedade Brasileira de Hemodinâmica e Cardiologia Intervencionista - SBHCIUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)Moraes, Eraldo Ribeiro Ferreira Leão de [UNIFESP]Carvalho, Antonio Carlos [UNIFESP]2015-06-14T13:36:39Z2015-06-14T13:36:39Z2007-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion400-407application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S2179-83972007000400015Revista Brasileira de Cardiologia Invasiva. Sociedade Brasileira de Hemodinâmica e Cardiologia Intervencionista - SBHCI, v. 15, n. 4, p. 400-407, 2007.10.1590/S2179-83972007000400015S2179-83972007000400015.pdf2179-8397S2179-83972007000400015http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/3472porRevista Brasileira de Cardiologia Invasivainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESPinstname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESP2024-08-06T11:21:48Zoai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/3472Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.unifesp.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.csp@unifesp.bropendoar:34652024-08-06T11:21:48Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Angioplastia de resgate no infarto agudo do miocárdio
Rescue angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction
title Angioplastia de resgate no infarto agudo do miocárdio
spellingShingle Angioplastia de resgate no infarto agudo do miocárdio
Moraes, Eraldo Ribeiro Ferreira Leão de [UNIFESP]
Myocardial infarction
Angioplasty
Thrombolytic therapy
Infarto do miocárdio
Angioplastia
Terapia trombolítica
title_short Angioplastia de resgate no infarto agudo do miocárdio
title_full Angioplastia de resgate no infarto agudo do miocárdio
title_fullStr Angioplastia de resgate no infarto agudo do miocárdio
title_full_unstemmed Angioplastia de resgate no infarto agudo do miocárdio
title_sort Angioplastia de resgate no infarto agudo do miocárdio
author Moraes, Eraldo Ribeiro Ferreira Leão de [UNIFESP]
author_facet Moraes, Eraldo Ribeiro Ferreira Leão de [UNIFESP]
Carvalho, Antonio Carlos [UNIFESP]
author_role author
author2 Carvalho, Antonio Carlos [UNIFESP]
author2_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Moraes, Eraldo Ribeiro Ferreira Leão de [UNIFESP]
Carvalho, Antonio Carlos [UNIFESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Myocardial infarction
Angioplasty
Thrombolytic therapy
Infarto do miocárdio
Angioplastia
Terapia trombolítica
topic Myocardial infarction
Angioplasty
Thrombolytic therapy
Infarto do miocárdio
Angioplastia
Terapia trombolítica
description BACKGROUND: Acute myocardial infarction is a serious and frequent illness, and its treatment with thrombolytic therapy or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is well established. Rescue PCI is an alternative when thrombolysis fails. In the last ten years several clinical studies have tested different features about this procedure. METHODS: Eighty four studies about rescue angioplasty published in the major cardiovascular relevance literary sources were analyzed between 1997 to 2007. RESULTS: Rescue PCI was superior to conservative treatment, such as rethrombolysis, when well indicated, and seemed similar to primary PCI, in some features. The concomitant use of GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors seemed to show clinical benefits. The use of drug-eluting stents and the association with mechanic thrombectomy still requires better scientific support. The latest metaanalysis about this topic have shown clear favorable results to rescue angioplasty according to clinical outcomes, heart failure and re-infarction, but not so definite results as to mortality. On the other hand, there was a trend of increased stroke risk, of the same magnitude as benefit. CONCLUSION: Rescue PCI has better results than conservative treatment or repeat fibrinolysis. However, the indication of the procedure still needs more precise selection criteria as well as better definition of the clinical benefit/safety ratio. These uncertainties persist due to the small number of rescue angioplasty procedures compared to the total number of angioplasties performed. In the CENIC Registry, rescue angioplasty amounts to 4% of all angioplasties performed.
publishDate 2007
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2007-01-01
2015-06-14T13:36:39Z
2015-06-14T13:36:39Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S2179-83972007000400015
Revista Brasileira de Cardiologia Invasiva. Sociedade Brasileira de Hemodinâmica e Cardiologia Intervencionista - SBHCI, v. 15, n. 4, p. 400-407, 2007.
10.1590/S2179-83972007000400015
S2179-83972007000400015.pdf
2179-8397
S2179-83972007000400015
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/3472
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S2179-83972007000400015
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/3472
identifier_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Cardiologia Invasiva. Sociedade Brasileira de Hemodinâmica e Cardiologia Intervencionista - SBHCI, v. 15, n. 4, p. 400-407, 2007.
10.1590/S2179-83972007000400015
S2179-83972007000400015.pdf
2179-8397
S2179-83972007000400015
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Cardiologia Invasiva
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 400-407
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Hemodinâmica e Cardiologia Intervencionista - SBHCI
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Hemodinâmica e Cardiologia Intervencionista - SBHCI
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron:UNIFESP
instname_str Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron_str UNIFESP
institution UNIFESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv biblioteca.csp@unifesp.br
_version_ 1841453461528379392